Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740345›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Uncertainty Quantification in Segmenting Tuberculosis-Consistent Findings in Frontal Chest X-rays.

Sivaramakrishnan Rajaraman, Ghada Zamzmi, Feng Yang, Zhiyun Xue, Stefan Jaeger, Sameer K Antani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sivaramakrishnan RajaramanNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0871-8634
Ghada ZamzmiNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Feng YangNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8334-7450
Zhiyun XueNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Stefan JaegerNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-4318
Sameer K AntaniNational Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0040-1387

Funding

Machine learning and artificial intelligence research for clinical medical image processingZIALM010018 · NLM · NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE · PI ANTANI, SAMEER · 2021 to 2025
$9.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) methods have demonstrated superior performance in medical image segmentation tasks. However, selecting a loss function that conforms to the data characteristics is critical for optimal performance. Further, the direct use of traditional DL models does not provide a measure of uncertainty in predictions. Even high-quality automated predictions for medical diagnostic applications demand uncertainty quantification to gain user trust. In this study, we aim to investigate the benefits of (i) selecting an appropriate loss function and (ii) quantifying uncertainty in predictions using a VGG16-based-U-Net model with the Monto-Carlo (MCD) Dropout method for segmenting Tuberculosis (TB)-consistent findings in frontal chest X-rays (CXRs). We determine an optimal uncertainty threshold based on several uncertainty-related metrics. This threshold is used to select and refer highly uncertain cases to an expert. Experimental results demonstrate that (i) the model trained with a modified Focal Tversky loss function delivered superior segmentation performance (mean average precision (mAP): 0.5710, 95% confidence interval (CI): (0.4021,0.7399)), (ii) the model with 30 MC forward passes during inference further improved and stabilized performance (mAP: 0.5721, 95% CI: (0.4032,0.7410), and (iii) an uncertainty threshold of 0.7 is observed to be optimal to refer highly uncertain cases.

Indexed as

chest X-rayconfidence intervalsdeep learningmean average precisionmedical image segmentationMonte–Carlo Dropouttuberculosisuncertaintyuncertainty quantification

Identifiers

PMID35740345
PMCPMC9220007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.