Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740336›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Widen the Applicability of a Convolutional Neural-Network-Assisted Glaucoma Detection Algorithm of Limited Training Images across Different Datasets.

Yu-Chieh Ko, Wei-Shiang Chen, Hung-Hsun Chen, Tsui-Kang Hsu, Ying-Chi Chen, Catherine Jui-Ling Liu, Henry Horng-Shing Lu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yu-Chieh KoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Sec. 2, Shihpai Rd., Taipei 11217, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-0818-4962
Wei-Shiang ChenInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 4F, Assembly Building I, 1001 University Rd., Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0003-1924-0285
Hung-Hsun ChenProgram of Artificial intelligence & Information Security, Fu Jen Catholic University, 510, Zhongzheng Rd., New Taipei City 24205, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-6437-9804
Tsui-Kang HsuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Cheng Hsin General Hospital, 45 Zhenxing St., Taipei 11240, Taiwan.
Ying-Chi ChenCollege of Engineering, University of Michigan, 2260 Hayward St., Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Catherine Jui-Ling LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 201 Sec. 2, Shihpai Rd., Taipei 11217, Taiwan.
Henry Horng-Shing LuInstitute of Statistics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, 4F, Assembly Building I, 1001 University Rd., Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4392-3361
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWCheng Hsin General Hospital · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 108-3011-F-075-001, MOST 107-2634-F-075-001, MOST 106-2314-F-075-001, MOST 106-2314-B-075-037, MOST 110-2118-M-A49-002-MY3 and MOST-110-2634-F-A49-005Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 110-2314-B-075-065
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated glaucoma detection using deep learning may increase the diagnostic rate of glaucoma to prevent blindness, but generalizable models are currently unavailable despite the use of huge training datasets. This study aims to evaluate the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier trained with a limited number of high-quality fundus images in detecting glaucoma and methods to improve its performance across different datasets. A CNN classifier was constructed using EfficientNet B3 and 944 images collected from one medical center (core model) and externally validated using three datasets. The performance of the core model was compared with (1) the integrated model constructed by using all training images from the four datasets and (2) the dataset-specific model built by fine-tuning the core model with training images from the external datasets. The diagnostic accuracy of the core model was 95.62% but dropped to ranges of 52.5-80.0% on the external datasets. Dataset-specific models exhibited superior diagnostic performance on the external datasets compared to other models, with a diagnostic accuracy of 87.50-92.5%. The findings suggest that dataset-specific tuning of the core CNN classifier effectively improves its applicability across different datasets when increasing training images fails to achieve generalization.

Indexed as

deep learningdiagnosisfundus photographglaucoma

Identifiers

PMID35740336
PMCPMC9219722
OpenAlexW4281836289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.