Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740174›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Revisiting the Frequency and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns of Bacteria Implicated in Community Urinary Tract Infections.

Andreia Silva, Elisabeth Costa, Américo Freitas, Adelaide Almeida

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Detection of plasmid-mediatedInfectious diseases & immunity · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreia SilvaDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-0932
Elisabeth CostaClinical Analysis Laboratory Avelab, Rua Cerâmica do Vouga, 3800-011 Aveiro, Portugal.
Américo FreitasClinical Analysis Laboratory Avelab, Rua Cerâmica do Vouga, 3800-011 Aveiro, Portugal.
Adelaide AlmeidaDepartment of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-8422-8664
University of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are one of the most common infectious diseases at the community level. The continue misuse of antimicrobials is leading to an increase in bacterial resistance, which is a worldwide problem. The objective of this work was to study the incidence and pattern of antimicrobial resistance of the main bacteria responsible for UTI in the community of central and northern Portugal, and establish an appropriate empirical treatment. The urine samples were collected in Avelab—Laboratório Médico de Análises Clínicas over a period of 5 years (2015−2019). The urine cultures were classified as positive when bacterial growth was equal to or higher than 105 CFU/mL, and only for these cases, an antimicrobial susceptibility test was performed. Of the 106,019 samples analyzed, 15,439 had a urinary infection. Urinary infections were more frequent in females (79.6%) than in males (20.4%), affecting more elderly patients (56.9%). Escherichia coli (70.1%) was the most frequent uropathogen, followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (8.9%). The bacteria responsible for UTI varied according to the patient’s sex, with the greatest differences being observed for Enterococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, these being more prevalent in men. In general, there was a growth in bacterial resistance as the age of the patients increased. The resistance of bacteria in male patients was, in most cases, statistically different (Chi-Square test, p < 0.05) from that observed for bacteria isolated from female patients, showing, in general, higher resistance in male patients. Although E. coli was the most responsible uropathogen for UTI, it was among the bacteria most susceptible to antibiotics. The isolates of K. pneumoniae, Proteus vulgaris and Enterobacter showed high resistance to the tested antimicrobials. The most common multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria implicated in UTI were K. pneumoniae (40.4%) and P. aeruginosa (34.7%), but E. coli, the most responsible bacteria for UTI, showed a MDR of 23.3%. When we compared our results with the results from 10 years ago for the same region, in general, an increase in bacterial resistance was observed. The results of this study confirmed that urinary tract infections are a very common illness, caused frequently by resistant uropathogens, for which the antibiotic resistance profile has varied over a short time, even within a specific region. This indicates that periodically monitoring the microbial resistance of each region is essential in order to select the best empirical antibiotic therapy against these infections, and prevent or decrease the resistance among uropathogenic strains.

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobialscommunity acquired infectionsurinary tract infectionuropathogens

Identifiers

PMID35740174
PMCPMC9220357
OpenAlexW4281766377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.