Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35740126›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Efficacy of Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole in Combination with an Echinocandin as a First-Line Treatment Option for Pneumocystis Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hideo Kato, Mao Hagihara, Nobuhiro Asai, Takumi Umemura, Yuichi Shibata, Jun Hirai, Yuka Yamagishi, Takuya Iwamoto, Hiroshige Mikamo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Clinical characteristics ofJournal of thoracic disease · 2025
    Article
  5. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Clinical Pharmacist Involved in the Treatment ofInfection and drug resistance · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hideo KatoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-5272-9560
Mao HagiharaDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Nobuhiro AsaiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Takumi UmemuraDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-3160-5136
Yuichi ShibataDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Jun HiraiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-9184-7175
Yuka YamagishiDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Takuya IwamotoDepartment of Pharmacy, Mie University Hospital, Tsu 514-8507, Japan.
Hiroshige MikamoDepartment of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute 480-1195, Japan.
Aichi Medical University · JPMie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although combination therapy using trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) plus echinocandins has been reported to reduce the mortality of patients with pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP), it remains unclear whether it is more effective than TMP-SMX monotherapy, the current first-line treatment for this disease. Hence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacies of these treatment options for PCP. The Scopus, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and Ichushi databases were searched for studies (up to January 2022) reporting the mortality and positive response rates (fewer clinical symptoms, improved partial pressure of arterial oxygen, and resolution of pneumonitis on chest imaging) of PCP patients receiving monotherapy or combination therapy. Four studies met the inclusion criteria. All four presented mortality data and one had positive response rates. Compared with the monotherapy, the combination therapy resulted in significantly lower mortality and higher positive response rates (mortality: odds ratio (OR) 2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.46-3.31; positive response rate: OR 2.13, 95%CI 1.41-3.23), suggesting it to be an effective and promising first-line therapy for PCP. However, further safety evaluations are needed to establish this as a fact.

Indexed as

combination therapyechinocandinmeta-analysispneumocystis pneumoniatrimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole

Identifiers

PMID35740126
PMCPMC9220274
OpenAlexW4281672077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.