ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Potential of α-Mangostin from
Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential effects, mechanisms and translational perspectives of natural products in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of Dietary Supplementation with α-Mangostin on Oviduct Inflammation and Eggshell Quality in Aging Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- The Nephroprotective Effects of Alpha-Mangostin for Acute Kidney Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Propolis-Based Nanostructured Lipid Carrier of α-Mangostin for Promoting Diabetic Wound Healing in Alloxan-Induced Mice.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Can α-Mangostin and Photodynamic Therapy Support Ciprofloxacin in the Inactivation of UropathogenicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- α-Mangostin Attenuates Blood Pressure and Reverses Vascular Remodeling by Balancing ACE/AT1R and ACE2/Ang-(1-7)/MasR Axes in Ang II-Infused Hypertensive Mice.Phytotherapy research : PTR · 2024Article
- Updating the Pharmacological Effects of α-Mangostin Compound and Unraveling Its Mechanism of Action: A Computational Study Review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Article
- Amino-Acid-Conjugated Natural Compounds: Aims, Designs and Results.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The utilization of mangosteen pericarp extract for anticoccidial drug replacement in broiler feed.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of α-mangostin derived from Garcinia mangostana against different microbes. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Science Direct until March 2022. The research question was developed based on a PICO (Population, Intervention, Control and Outcomes) model. In this study, the population of interest was microbes, α-mangostin extracted from Garcinia mangostana was used as exposure while antibiotics were used as control, followed by the outcome which is determined by the antimicrobial activity of α-mangostin against studied microbes. Two reviewers independently performed the comprehensive literature search following the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A methodological quality assessment was carried out using a scoring protocol and the risk of bias in the studies was analyzed. Reward screening was performed among the selected articles to perform a meta-analysis based on the pre-determined criteria. Case groups where α-mangostin extracted from Garcinia mangostana was incorporated were compared to groups using different antibiotics or antiseptic agents (control) to evaluate their effectiveness. A total of 30 studies were included; they were heterogeneous in their study design and the risk of bias was moderate. The results showed a reduction in microbial counts after the incorporation of α-mangostin, which resulted in better disinfection and effectiveness against multiple microbes. Additionally, the meta-analysis result revealed no significant difference (p > 0.05) in their effectiveness when α-mangostin was compared to commercially available antibiotics. α-mangostin worked effectively against the tested microbes and was shown to have inhibitory effects on microbes with antibiotic resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.