Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739839›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

A Comparative Study of Canine Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Different Sources.

Filip Humenik, Marcela Maloveska, Nikola Hudakova, Patricia Petrouskova, Lubica Hornakova, Michal Domaniza, Dagmar Mudronova, Simona Bodnarova, Dasa Cizkova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering for Cleft Defects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Aging Cartilage Regeneration: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Stem Cells in Domestic Animals: Applications in Health and Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Filip HumenikCentre of Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Medicine, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Marcela MaloveskaCentre of Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Medicine, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Nikola HudakovaCentre of Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Medicine, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Patricia PetrouskovaCentre of Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Medicine, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0003-3464-8502
Lubica HornakovaUniversity Veterinary Hospital, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Michal DomanizaUniversity Veterinary Hospital, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.
Dagmar MudronovaInstitute of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-8007-6237
Simona BodnarovaDepartment of Pneumology a Phtiseology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Pavol Jozef Safarik, 041 80 Kosice, Slovakia.
Dasa CizkovaCentre of Experimental and Clinical Regenerative Medicine, The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice, 041 81 Kosice, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-2504-3993
University of Veterinary Medicine in Košice · SKSlovak Academy of Sciences · SKUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SK

Funding

Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education Slovak Republic VEGA 1/0285/22Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-19-0193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we provide comprehensive analyses of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) isolated from three types of canine tissues: bone marrow (BM-MSCs), adipose tissue (AT-MSCs) and amniotic tissue (AM-MSCs). We compare their morphology, phenotype, multilineage potential and proliferation activity. The BM-MSCs and AM-MSCs showed fibroblast-like shapes against the spindle shape of the AT-MSCs. All populations showed strong osteogenic and chondrogenic potential. However, we observed phenotypic differences. The BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs revealed high expression of CD29, CD44, CD90 and CD105 positivity compared to the AM-MSCs, which showed reduced expression of all the analysed CD markers. Similarly, the isolation yield and proliferation varied depending on the source. The highest isolation yield and proliferation were detected in the population of AT-MSCs, while the AM-MSCs showed a high yield of cells, but the lowest proliferation activity, in contrast to the BM-MSCs which had the lowest isolation yield. Thus, the present data provide assumptions for obtaining a homogeneous MSC derived from all three canine tissues for possible applications in veterinary regenerative medicine, while the origin of isolated MSCs must always be taken into account.

Indexed as

canine mesenchymal stem cellsmorphologymultilineage potentialphenotype

Identifiers

PMID35739839
PMCPMC9219547
OpenAlexW4282032989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.