Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739826›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Canine Smell Preferences-Do Dogs Have Their Favorite Scents?

Agata Kokocińska, Martyna Woszczyło, Silvestre Sampino, Michał Dzięcioł, Mikołaj Zybała, Anna Szczuka, Julita Korczyńska, Iwona Rozempolska-Rucińska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Agata KokocińskaInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka St., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
Martyna WoszczyłoDepartment of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 49, 50-366 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6976-5691
Silvestre SampinoDepartment of Experimental Embryology, Institute of Genetics and Animal Biotechnology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Postepu 36A St., Jastrzebiec, 05-552 Magdalenka, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8266-5062
Michał DzięciołDepartment of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, Wroclaw University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Grunwaldzki Sq. 49, 50-366 Wrocław, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5063-4306
Mikołaj ZybałaEthoplanet Ethological Centre of Training and Consulting, Owocowy Sad 53/3 St., 05-500 Piaseczno, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9020-4677
Anna SzczukaLaboratory of Ethology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Pasteur St. 3, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Julita KorczyńskaLaboratory of Ethology, Department of Neurophysiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Pasteur St. 3, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-8798
Iwona Rozempolska-RucińskaInstitute of Biological Bases of Animal Production, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, 13 Akademicka St., 20-950 Lublin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5025-0225

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The available evidence on dogs' scent preferences is quite limited. The purpose of this study was to verify the canine response to selected odors that may also be preferred by humans. The experiment was performed using 14 adult dogs (10 female and 4 male) of different breeds, body size, and age (1-14 years). During the experiment, dogs were exposed to 33 odor samples: a neutral sample containing pure dipropylene glycol (control) and 32 samples containing dipropylene glycol and fragrance oils. The dog was brought to the experimental area by its handler, who then stopped at the entrance, unleashed the dog, and remained in the starting position. The dog freely explored the area for 30 s. All dog movements and behavior were recorded and analyzed. The methodology of observing the dogs freely exploring the experimental area allowed us to determine the smells that were the most attractive to them (food, beaver clothing). Our study shows that dogs interacted more frequently with the scents of blueberries, blackberries, mint, rose, lavender, and linalol.

Indexed as

cosmetics repellentsdogolfactionsmell preferences

Identifiers

PMID35739826
PMCPMC9219509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.