Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739597›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2022

Clinical yarning with Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples-a systematic scoping review of its use and impacts.

Alexander W Burke, Susan Welch, Tamara Power, Cherie Lucas, Rebekah J Moles

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander W BurkeSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building A15, Science Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Susan WelchSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building A15, Science Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Tamara PowerSusan Wakil School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Cherie LucasGraduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Rebekah J MolesSydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Pharmacy Building A15, Science Road, Camperdown, NSW, 2006, Australia. Rebekah.moles@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-6728
The University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore how clinical yarning has been utilised as a health intervention for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander peoples and if there are any reported impacts yarning might have on health outcomes. STUDY

designSystematic scoping review of published literature. DATA SOURCES: A one-word search term "yarning" was applied in Scopus, EMBASE, CINAHL, MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Australian Public Affairs Information Service-Health, and the Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Health Bibliography databases. Databases were searched from inception to May 20, 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included where clinical yarning had been used as a health intervention. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed and applied according to PRISMA systematic and scoping review reporting methods. DATA SYNTHESIS: A total of 375 manuscripts were found from the initial data search. After removal of duplicates and removal of manuscripts based on abstract review, a total of 61 studies underwent full-text review. Of these, only five met the inclusion criteria of utilising yarning as a clinical intervention. Four of these studies described consumer self-reported health outcomes, with only one study looking at improvements in objective physiological health outcomes.

conclusionsWhilst clinical yarning may be a culturally appropriate intervention in healthcare, there are limited studies that have measured the impact of this intervention. Further research may be needed to ascertain the true benefits of this intervention.

Indexed as

Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander PeoplesPatient-Centered CareAustraliaCulturally Competent CareHumansSelf ReportAboriginal and/or Torres Strait IslanderClinical yarningHealth outcomesYarning

Identifiers

PMID35739597
PMCPMC9219179
OpenAlexW4283315332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.