Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739595›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2022

Pregnancy and childbirth outcomes among indigenous adolescents in Guatemala: a cohort study.

Noe Gómez, Odette Del Risco Sánchez, Maira Pinho-Pompeu, Helymar Machado, Luis Bahamondes, Fernanda Surita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.

Noe GómezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Odette Del Risco SánchezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Maira Pinho-PompeuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Helymar MachadoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Luis BahamondesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil.
Fernanda SuritaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of Campinas, Av. Alexander Fleming, 101-101 Alexander Fleming Street, Campinas, SP, 13083-881, Brazil. surita@unicamp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4335-0337
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess some characteristics and outcomes associated with pregnancy among Indigenous adolescents and compare them with other women who gave birth in a public hospital in Guatemala.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 8048 cases. Sociocultural variables, gynecological and obstetric history, childbirth, and perinatal outcomes were compared among women who gave birth at San Juan De Dios Hospital between January 2018 and June 2019. They were classified into four groups according to age and ethnicity. Indigenous adolescents (819/10.2%) were compared with Nonindigenous adolescents (813/10.1%), Indigenous adult women (3324/41.3%), and Nonindigenous adult women (3092/38.4%). Bivariate analysis and multiple logistic regression were applied.

resultsWe found that Indigenous adolescents who gave birth in the public hospital had fewer years of schooling than Nonindigenous adolescents (p < 0.001), Indigenous adults (p < 0.001), and Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001). Indigenous adolescents were more likely to have an unplanned pregnancy than Nonindigenous adolescents (p = 0.038) and Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be single (p < 0.001) and use less previous contraception than Indigenous and Nonindigenous adult women (p = 0.007 and p = 0.013, respectively). More than one-third of Indigenous adolescents and adults did not attend antenatal care; Indigenous adolescents had fewer antenatal care visits than Nonindigenous adults (p < 0.001), and the results were borderline in comparison to Nonindigenous adolescents (p = 0.051). Indigenous and Nonindigenous adult women underwent episiotomy less often than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 0.60 [95% CI 0.49-0.74] and OR: 0.56 [95% CI 0.45-0.70], respectively) and received less local anesthesia than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 0.59 [95% CI 0.46-0.76] and OR: 0.77 [95% CI 0.60-0.99], respectively). Nonindigenous adults received more analgesia than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 1.36 [95% CI 1.07-1.73]). Nonindigenous adolescents had more newborns with low birth weight than Indigenous adolescents (OR: 1.44 [95% CI 1.10-1.87]).

conclusionIndigenous adolescents who gave birth in a public hospital in Guatemala were more likely to be single during pregnancy and attend fewer years of school than Nonindigenous adolescents. Unplanned pregnancies were more common among Indigenous adolescents, and some of them underwent not recommended obstetric practices during childbirth, such as episiotomy. Police should be enforced ensuring equal opportunities for different ethnic and age groups regarding pregnancy.

Indexed as

ParturitionPrenatal CareAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesFemaleGuatemalaHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyRetrospective StudiesAdolescent pregnancyGuatemalaIndigenous womenReproductive healthVulnerability

Identifiers

PMID35739595
PMCPMC9229429
OpenAlexW4283326302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.