Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739594›Full record

Trial reportBMC medical education2022

Comparison between two asynchronous teaching methods in an undergraduate dental course: a pilot study.

Fahad Alharbi, Saleh H Alwadei, Abdurahman Alwadei, Saeed Asiri, Farhan Alwadei, Ali Alqerban, Mohammed Almuzian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04692142 (Comparison Between Different Asynchronous Teaching Methods in an Undergraduate Orthodontic Course), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04692142 nacompletednot on this map

Comparison Between Different Asynchronous Teaching Methods in an Undergraduate Orthodontic Course: A Crossover Randomised Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityRan2020 to 2022Enrolled32ConditionsEducational ProblemsArmsFlipped classroom teaching method
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Utility of a Novel Trainee-Level Hematology/Oncology Podcast in Graduate Medical Education: a Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024
    Article
  6. Perception of Remote Learning by Fixed Prosthodontic Students at a Romanian Faculty of Dentistry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fahad AlharbiDepartment of preventive dental sciences/College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia. fahad.alharbi@psau.edu.sa.
Saleh H AlwadeiDepartment of preventive dental sciences/College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Abdurahman AlwadeiDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry and Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saeed AsiriDepartment of preventive dental sciences/College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Farhan AlwadeiDepartment of preventive dental sciences/College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Ali AlqerbanDepartment of preventive dental sciences/College of Dentistry, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed AlmuzianPrivate clinic, Edinburgh, UK.
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University · SAKing Saud University · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProperly designed and implemented eLearning can lead to improvement of dental teaching quality. Various strategies have been proposed to increase the effectiveness of eLearning in dental education, however, there is a lack of research to assess the effectiveness of these strategies.

objectiveTo investigate dental students' learning performance and perception of a virtual flipped learning format compared to a virtual traditional learning method.

methodsA crossover pilot study was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Princes Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. Computer-generated randomization, blinded from researchers who analyzed the results, was performed to allocate 32 participants (aged 23.27 ± 0.86 years) to one of two groups. Participants in the control group were taught through the virtual traditional learning method (VTL) using live video lectures. In contrast, participants in the intervention group were taught through the virtual flipped learning method (VFL) using recorded online lectures and post-lecture virtual discussions. Learning gain and preference were measured by pre- and post-test average score differences and a modified validated survey, respectively.

resultsThere was no significant difference in learning performance between VFL and VTL groups (P > 0.05). However, students preferred VFL over VTL and the differences were significant among all survey items, except for the opportunity to ask questions.

conclusionHealth professions educators are encouraged to carefully design online curricula with efficient learning strategies that help students improve learning performance and foster self-directed learning skills while valuing active learning in an online environment.

trial registrationNCT04692142 , 31/12/2020.

Indexed as

Problem-Based LearningStudentsCurriculumHumansPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTeachingDental educationDental studentsLearningTeaching methods

Identifiers

PMID35739594
PMCPMC9219382
OpenAlexW4283326871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.