Trial reportBMC medical education2022
Comparison between two asynchronous teaching methods in an undergraduate dental course: a pilot study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04692142 (Comparison Between Different Asynchronous Teaching Methods in an Undergraduate Orthodontic Course), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison Between Different Asynchronous Teaching Methods in an Undergraduate Orthodontic Course: A Crossover Randomised Trial
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of flipped classroom in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Self-directed learning assessment practices in undergraduate health professions education: a systematic review.Medical education online · 2023Pooled it
- Development and application of a standardized teaching assessment system for digital automated oral implantation planning skills: a randomized controlled pilot trial.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Online active learning in undergraduate dental education: A scoping review.Journal of dental education · 2025Article
- Utility of a Novel Trainee-Level Hematology/Oncology Podcast in Graduate Medical Education: a Pilot Study.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2024Article
- Perception of Remote Learning by Fixed Prosthodontic Students at a Romanian Faculty of Dentistry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Article
- Learning and satisfaction levels with online teaching methods among undergraduate dental students - A survey.Journal of advanced pharmaceutical technology & research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProperly designed and implemented eLearning can lead to improvement of dental teaching quality. Various strategies have been proposed to increase the effectiveness of eLearning in dental education, however, there is a lack of research to assess the effectiveness of these strategies.
objectiveTo investigate dental students' learning performance and perception of a virtual flipped learning format compared to a virtual traditional learning method.
methodsA crossover pilot study was conducted at the College of Dentistry, Princes Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. Computer-generated randomization, blinded from researchers who analyzed the results, was performed to allocate 32 participants (aged 23.27 ± 0.86 years) to one of two groups. Participants in the control group were taught through the virtual traditional learning method (VTL) using live video lectures. In contrast, participants in the intervention group were taught through the virtual flipped learning method (VFL) using recorded online lectures and post-lecture virtual discussions. Learning gain and preference were measured by pre- and post-test average score differences and a modified validated survey, respectively.
resultsThere was no significant difference in learning performance between VFL and VTL groups (P > 0.05). However, students preferred VFL over VTL and the differences were significant among all survey items, except for the opportunity to ask questions.
conclusionHealth professions educators are encouraged to carefully design online curricula with efficient learning strategies that help students improve learning performance and foster self-directed learning skills while valuing active learning in an online environment.
trial registrationNCT04692142 , 31/12/2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.