Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739591›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's research & therapy2022

Fully automated and highly specific plasma β-amyloid immunoassays predict β-amyloid status defined by amyloid positron emission tomography with high accuracy.

Kazuto Yamashita, Masahiro Miura, Shunsuke Watanabe, Kengo Ishiki, Yuji Arimatsu, Junko Kawahira, Toshiko Kubo, Katsutaka Sasaki, Takayuki Arai, Kei Hagino and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Circulating Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Is blood pTau a reliable indicator of the CSF status? A narrative review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kazuto YamashitaCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Masahiro MiuraCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Shunsuke WatanabeCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Kengo IshikiCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Yuji ArimatsuBusiness Incubation Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Junko KawahiraBusiness Incubation Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Toshiko KuboSysmex R&D Center Americas, Inc., Mundelein, IL, USA.
Katsutaka SasakiReagent Engineering Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Takayuki AraiReagent Engineering Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Kei HaginoBusiness Incubation Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Yasuhiro IrinoCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Kota NagaiJapan and Asia Clinical Development Department, Eisai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
David VerbelBiostatistics, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Akihiko KoyamaTranslational Science, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Shobha DhaddaBiostatistics and Project Operations, Eisai Inc., Nutley, NJ, USA.
Hayato NiiroMedical Affairs Division, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeki IwanagaCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan. Iwanaga.Shigeki@sysmex.co.jp.
Toshiyuki SatoCentral Research Laboratories, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Tomokazu YoshidaSysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Atsushi IwataDepartment of Neurology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. iwata-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Sysmex (Japan) · JPEisai (United States) · USEisai (Japan) · JPTokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinicians, researchers, and patients alike would greatly benefit from more accessible and inexpensive biomarkers for neural β-amyloid (Aβ). We aimed to assess the performance of fully automated plasma Aβ immunoassays, which correlate significantly with immunoprecipitation mass spectrometry assays, in predicting brain Aβ status as determined by visual read assessment of amyloid positron emission tomography (PET).

methodsThe plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was measured using a fully automated immunoassay platform (HISCL series) in two clinical studies (discovery and validation studies). The discovery and validation sample sets were retrospectively and randomly selected from participants with early Alzheimer's disease (AD) identified during screening for the elenbecestat Phase 3 program.

resultsWe included 197 participants in the discovery study (mean [SD] age 71.1 [8.5] years; 112 females) and 200 in the validation study (age 70.8 [7.9] years; 99 females). The plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio predicted amyloid PET visual read status with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.941 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.910-0.973) and 0.868 (95% CI 0.816-0.920) in the discovery and validation studies, respectively. In the discovery study, a cutoff value of 0.102 was determined based on maximizing the Youden Index, and the sensitivity and specificity were calculated to be 96.0% (95% CI 90.1-98.9%) and 83.5% (95% CI 74.6-90.3%), respectively. Using the same cutoff value, the sensitivity and specificity in the validation study were calculated to be 88.0% (95% CI 80.0-93.6%) and 72.0% (95% CI 62.1-80.5%), respectively.

conclusionsThe plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio measured using the HISCL series achieved high accuracy in predicting amyloid PET status. Since our blood-based immunoassay system is less invasive and more accessible than amyloid PET and cerebrospinal fluid testing, it may contribute to the diagnosis of AD in routine clinical practice.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloidosisAgedAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunoassayPeptide FragmentsPositron-Emission TomographyRetrospective StudiesAmyloidAmyloid beta-PeptidesBiomarkersPeptide FragmentsAlzheimer’s diseaseAβ42/Aβ40Beta-amyloidBiomarkerDiagnosisImmunoassayPlasma

Identifiers

PMID35739591
PMCPMC9219197
OpenAlexW4283313843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.