Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739510›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

A promising Prognostic risk model for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with immune-related genes.

Peng Cao, Ji-Yue Wu, Jian-Dong Zhang, Ze-Jia Sun, Xiang Zheng, Bao-Zhong Yu, Hao-Yuan Cao, Fei-Long Zhang, Zi-Hao Gao, Wei Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng CaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ji-Yue WuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jian-Dong ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ze-Jia SunDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiang ZhengDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Bao-Zhong YuDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao-Yuan CaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fei-Long ZhangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zi-Hao GaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei WangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. zico73@medmail.com.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2642-3338
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

Capital Clinical Specialty and Application Research and Outcome Promotion Program Z17110000101755National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) 81771720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a third most common tumor of the urinary system. Nowadays, Immunotherapy is a hot topic in the treatment of solid tumors, especially for those tumors with pre-activated immune state.

methodsIn this study, we downloaded genomic and clinical data of RCC samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Four immune-related genetic signatures were used to predict the prognosis of RCC by Cox regression analysis. Then we established a prognostic risk model consisting of the genes most related to prognosis from four signatures to value prognosis of the RCC samples via Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis. An independent data from International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) database were used to test the predictive stability of the model. Furthermore, we performed landscape analysis to assess the difference of gene mutant in the RCC samples from TCGA. Finally, we explored the correlation between the selected genes and the level of tumor immune infiltration via Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) platform.

resultsWe used four genetic signatures to construct prognostic risk models respectively and found that each of the models could divide the RCC samples into high- and low-risk groups with significantly different prognosis, especially in advanced RCC. A comprehensive prognostic risk model was constructed by 8 candidate genes from four signatures (HLA-B, HLA-A, HLA-DRA, IDO1, TAGAP, CIITA, PRF1 and CD8B) dividing the advanced RCC samples from TCGA database into high-risk and low-risk groups with a significant difference in cancer-specific survival (CSS). The stability of the model was verified by independent data from ICGC database. And the classification efficiency of the model was stable for the samples from different subgroups. Landscape analysis showed that mutation ratios of some genes were different between two risk groups. In addition, the expression levels of the selected genes were significantly correlated with the infiltration degree of immune cells in the advanced RCC.

conclusionsSum up, eight immune-related genes were screened in our study to construct prognostic risk model with great predictive value for the prognosis of advanced RCC, and the genes were associated with infiltrating immune cells in tumors which have potential to conduct personalized treatment for advanced RCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorImmunologic signaturePrognosisRCCRenal cell carcinomaTumor immunity

Identifiers

PMID35739510
PMCPMC9229885
OpenAlexW4283331251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.