Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739316›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2023

Higher return to pre-injury type of sports after revision anterior ligament reconstruction with lateral extra-articular tenodesis compared to without lateral extra-articular tenodesis.

Michèle N J Keizer, Reinoud W Brouwer, Feike de Graaff, Roy A G Hoogeslag

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Anterolateral corner of knee: Current concepts.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Satisfactory outcomes after one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using rectangular tunnel technique.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michèle N J KeizerCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, UMCG Sector F, FA 23, PO Box 219, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.n.j.keizer@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7623-1612
Reinoud W BrouwerDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Feike de GraaffCentre for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine OCON, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Roy A G HoogeslagCentre for Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine OCON, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Center for Orthopaedics · USMartini Ziekenhuis · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the rate of return to pre-injury type of sports (RTS type) in patients after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) compared to patients after revision ACLR without LET.

methodsSeventy-eight patients who underwent revision ACLR with an autologous ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with and without LET were included at least one year after surgery (mean follow-up: 43.9, SD: 29.2 months). All patients filled in a questionnaire about RTS type, the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form (IKDC

resultsThe RTS type for revision ACLR with LET was 22 of 42 (52%), whereas 11 of 36 (31%) of the patients who underwent revision ACLR without LET returned to the pre-injury type of sport (p = 0.05). No significant differences were found in KOOS subscores, IKDC

conclusionAn additional LET increases the rate of RTS type after revision ACLR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTenodesisHumansKnee JointLigamentsACLLateral extra-articular tenodesisReturn to sportRevision

Identifiers

PMID35739316
PMCPMC10090021
OpenAlexW4283396363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.