ArticleScientific reports2022
Functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes acting as prognostic biomarkers in breast cancer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Poor Prognostic Markers in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Using Whole Exome Sequencing.Journal of breast cancer · 2025Article
- Machine learning identifies SRD5A3 as a propionate-related prognostic biomarker in triple-negative breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- eIF3b-driven autophagy and Wnt/β-catenin crosstalk: a novel regulatory axis in adriamycin resistance of breast cancer.Oncology reviews · 2025Review
- Prognosis prediction and risk stratification of breast cancer patients based on a mitochondria-related gene signature.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Refining breast cancer biomarker discovery and drug targeting through an advanced data-driven approach.BMC bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Exploring the promising potential of induced pluripotent stem cells in cancer research and therapy.Molecular cancer · 2023Review
- The multi-omics analyses of acsl1 reveal its translational significance as a tumor microenvironmental and prognostic biomarker in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Diagnostic pathology · 2023Article
- Biology of breast cancer brain metastases and novel therapies targeting the blood brain barrier: an updated review.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2023Review
- Pan-cancer investigation of psoriasis-related BUB1B gene: genetical alteration and oncogenic immunology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- LncTarD 2.0: an updated comprehensive database for experimentally-supported functional lncRNA-target regulations in human diseases.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- PRLR and CACNA2D1 Impact the Prognosis of Breast Cancer by Regulating Tumor Immunity.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Novel Thieno [2,3-International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Differences in genetic molecular features including mutation, copy number alterations and DNA methylation, can explain interindividual variability in response to anti-cancer drugs in cancer patients. However, identifying genetic alteration-driven genes and characterizing their functional mechanisms in different cancer types are still major challenges for cancer studies. Here, we systematically identified functional regulations between genetic alteration-driven genes and drug target genes and their potential prognostic roles in breast cancer. We identified two mutation and copy number-driven gene pairs (PARP1-ACSL1 and PARP1-SRD5A3), three DNA methylation-driven gene pairs (PRLR-CDKN1C, PRLR-PODXL2 and PRLR-SRD5A3), six gene pairs between mutation-driven genes and drug target genes (SLC19A1-SLC47A2, SLC19A1-SRD5A3, AKR1C3-SLC19A1, ABCB1-SRD5A3, NR3C2-SRD5A3 and AKR1C3-SRD5A3), and four copy number-driven gene pairs (ADIPOR2-SRD5A3, CASP12-SRD5A3, SLC39A11-SRD5A3 and GALNT2-SRD5A3) that all served as prognostic biomarkers of breast cancer. In particular, RARP1 was found to be upregulated by simultaneous copy number amplification and gene mutation. Copy number deletion and downregulated expression of ACSL1 and upregulation of SRD5A3 both were observed in breast cancers. Moreover, copy number deletion of ACSL1 was associated with increased resistance to PARP inhibitors. PARP1-ACSL1 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer owing to the suppression of the MAPK, mTOR and NF-kB signaling pathways, which induces apoptosis, autophagy and prevents inflammatory processes. Loss of SRD5A3 expression was also associated with increased sensitivity to PARP inhibitors. The PARP1-SRD5A3 pair significantly correlated with poor overall survival in breast cancer through regulating androgen receptors to induce cell proliferation. These results demonstrate that genetic alteration-driven gene pairs might serve as potential biomarkers for the prognosis of breast cancer and facilitate the identification of combination therapeutic targets for breast cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.