Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739245›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2023

A deep learning model established for evaluating lid margin signs with colour anterior segment photography.

Yuexin Wang, Xingheng Jia, Shanshan Wei, Xuemin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Artificial intelligence in corneal diseases: A narrative review.Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association · 2024
    Review
  5. Artificial intelligence in the anterior segment of eye diseases.International journal of ophthalmology · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yuexin Wang *Department of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4760-1279
Xingheng Jia *School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Shanshan Wei *Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xuemin LiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Beijing Key Laboratory of Restoration of Damaged Ocular Nerve, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China. lxmlxm66@sina.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7822-4694

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of applying a deep learning model to identify lid margin signs from colour anterior segment photography.

methodsWe collected a total of 832 colour anterior segment photographs from 428 dry eye patients. Eight lid margin signs were labelled by human ophthalmologists. Eight deep learning models were constructed based on VGGNet-13 and trained to identify lid margin signs. Sensitivity, specificity, receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) were applied to evaluate the models.

resultsThe AUC for rounding of posterior lid margin was 0.979 and was 0.977 and 0.980 for lid margin irregularity and vascularization. For hyperkeratinization, the AUC was 0.964. The AUCs for meibomian gland orifice (MGO) retroplacement and plugging were 0.963 and 0.968. For the mucocutaneous junction (MCJ) anteroplacement and retroplacement model, the AUCs were 0.950 and 0.978. The sensitivity and specificity for rounding of posterior lid margin were 0.974 and 0.921. For irregularity, the sensitivity and specificity were 0.930 and 0.938, and those for vascularization were 0.923 and 0.961. The hyperkeratinization model achieved a sensitivity and specificity of 0.889 and 0.948. The model identifying MGO plugging and retroplacement achieved a sensitivity of 0.979 and 0.909 with a specificity of 0.867 and 0.967. The sensitivity of MCJ anteroplacement and retroplacement were 0.875/0.969, with a specificity of 0.966/0.888.

conclusionsThe deep learning model could identify lid margin signs with high sensitivity and specificity. The study provided the potentiality of applying artificial intelligence in lid margin evaluation to assist dry eye decision-making.

Indexed as

Deep LearningDry Eye SyndromesEyelid DiseasesArtificial IntelligenceColorHumansMagnesium OxideMeibomian GlandsPhotographyMagnesium Oxide

Identifiers

PMID35739245
PMCPMC10170093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.