ArticleScientific reports2022
Diagnostic classification of cancers using DNA methylation of paracancerous tissues.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- cfMethylPre: deep transfer learning enhances cancer detection based on circulating cell-free DNA methylation profiling.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Predicting locus-specific DNA methylation levels in cancer and paracancer tissues.Epigenomics · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a three-gene methylation model for correlating lymph node metastasis in postoperative early gastric cancer adjacent samples.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Predictive modeling of perioperative blood transfusion in lumbar posterior interbody fusion using machine learning.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The potential role of DNA methylation from paracancerous tissues in cancer diagnosis has not been explored until now. In this study, we built classification models using well-known machine learning models based on DNA methylation profiles of paracancerous tissues. We evaluated our methods on nine cancer datasets collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and utilized fivefold cross-validation to assess the performance of models. Additionally, we performed gene ontology (GO) enrichment analysis on the basis of the significant CpG sites selected by feature importance scores of XGBoost model, aiming to identify biological pathways involved in cancer progression. We also exploited the XGBoost algorithm to classify cancer types using DNA methylation profiles of paracancerous tissues in external validation datasets. Comparative experiments suggested that XGBoost achieved better predictive performance than the other four machine learning methods in predicting cancer stage. GO enrichment analysis revealed key pathways involved, highlighting the importance of paracancerous tissues in cancer progression. Furthermore, XGBoost model can accurately classify nine different cancers from TCGA, and the feature sets selected by XGBoost can also effectively predict seven cancer types on independent GEO datasets. This study provided new insights into cancer diagnosis from an epigenetic perspective and may facilitate the development of personalized diagnosis and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.