Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35739159›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

New multi-criteria decision-making technique based on neutrosophic axiomatic design.

Mohamed Abdel-Basset, Mai Mohamed, Nehal N Mostafa, Ibrahim M El-Henawy, Mohamed Abouhawwash

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mohamed Abdel-BassetFaculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Shaibet an Nakareyah, Zagazig, 44519, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
Mai MohamedFaculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Shaibet an Nakareyah, Zagazig, 44519, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
Nehal N MostafaFaculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Shaibet an Nakareyah, Zagazig, 44519, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
Ibrahim M El-HenawyFaculty of Computers and Informatics, Zagazig University, Shaibet an Nakareyah, Zagazig, 44519, Ash Sharqia Governorate, Egypt.
Mohamed AbouhawwashDepartment of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. abouhaww@msu.edu.
Zagazig University · EGMansoura University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are several multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) approaches presented in the literature with their characteristics. Although traditional MCDM approaches are considered a proper implementation to select the best alternative from available types, they failed to consider uncertainty which is quite high and desires to be thoughtfully measured in the selection process. This research focuses on extending MCDM in the neutrosophic environment using axiomatic design (AD) as a novel contribution to selecting appropriate Computed Tomography (CT) devices. We present a new linguistic scale for evaluating criteria and alternatives based on single-valued triangular neutrosophic numbers (SVTrN). The proposed approach is superior to other existing approaches due to its simplicity and ability to simulate natural human thinking via considering truth, indeterminacy, and falsity degrees. Then, applying it will increase the value of imaging for medical decision-making and decrease needless costs. So, this study can be valuable to researchers by helping them consider the appropriate medical imaging system selection problem theoretically under uncertainty, and for governments and organizations to design better satisfying medical imaging evaluation systems.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingLinguisticsHumansUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35739159
PMCPMC9226015
OpenAlexW4283311926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.