Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738951›Full record

ArticleDental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials2022

3D-printed bi-layered polymer/hydrogel construct for interfacial tissue regeneration in a canine model.

Mohammad Reza Jamalpour, Amir Yadegari, Farshid Vahdatinia, Leila Mohammadi Amirabad, Shokoofeh Jamshidi, Setareh Shojaei, Abbas Shokri, Erfan Moeinifard, Meisam Omidi, Lobat Tayebi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparative Analysis of Gelatin/Polylactic Acid and Commercial PLA Membranes for Guided Bone Regeneration: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Trial
  3. The Japanese dental science review · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. 3D Bioprinting in Limb Salvage Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Reza JamalpourDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; Dental Implants Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Amir YadegariMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53207, USA.
Farshid VahdatiniaDental Implants Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Leila Mohammadi AmirabadDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Shokoofeh JamshidiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; Dental Implants Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Setareh ShojaeiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Abbas ShokriDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Erfan MoeinifardDental Implants Research Center, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran; Private Practice in Royal Veterinary Clinic, Hamadan, Iran.
Meisam OmidiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53207, USA.
Lobat TayebiMarquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, WI 53207, USA. Electronic address: lobat.tayebi@marquette.edu.
Hamedan University of Medical Sciences · IRMarquette University · US

Funding

Supplement: Development of an Integrated 3D Human Osteo-Mucosal ModelR15DE027533 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2018 to 2021
$816k
Vascularization of critical-sized craniomaxillofacial defectsR56DE029191 · NIDCR · MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY · PI TAYEBI, LOBAT · 2021 to 2021
$363k
NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE027533NIDCR NIH HHS R56 DE029191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere are complications in applying regenerative strategies at the interface of hard and soft tissues due to the limited designs of constructs that can accommodate different cell types in different sites. The problem originates from the challenges in the adhesion of dissimilar materials, such as polymers and hydrogels, that can be suitable for regenerating different tissues such as bone and soft tissues. This paper presents a design of a new hybrid construct in which a polymer (polycaprolactone (PCL)) membrane firmly adheres to a layer of hydrogen (gelatin).

methodsPCL membranes with defined size and porosity were fabricated using 3D printing. The gelatin layer was attached to the PCL membranes using the aminolysis procedure. We have examined this construct for the application of Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) as a typical surgical regenerative procedure of the oral cavity at the interface of bone and soft tissue. Complete in vitro and in vivo investigations on canine tibia bone defects have been performed. Histological analyses for fibrosis morphometric and bone morphometric evaluation, as well as bone-fibrosis histological grading and CBCT imaging, were conducted.

resultsChemical and morphological studies of the membrane proved that gelatin was uniformly attached to the aminolyzed PCL membranes. The in vitro and in vivo studies indicated the membrane's biocompatibility, mechanical stability, and barrier function for the GBR application. Furthermore, in vitro study showed that the membranes could improve osteogenesis and the regeneration of bone defects. The results illustrated that the mean bone density in the membrane groups was about three times more than that of the control group. SIGNIFICANCE: The fabricated 3D-printed hybrid Gelatin/PCL bi-layered membrane can be a good candidate for interfacial tissue engineering and a promising membrane for GBR procedure.

Indexed as

GelatinHydrogelsBiocompatible MaterialsBone RegenerationCell ProliferationFibrosisHumansPolyestersPolymersPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsGelatinHydrogelsPolyestersPolymers3D-printed PCL membraneBi-layered polymer/hydrogen membraneCanine modelGBRGelatin/PCL membraneGuided bone regeneration

Identifiers

PMID35738951
PMCPMC9339537
OpenAlexW4283203986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.