Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738842›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2022

Exploring complementary and competitive relations between non-communicable disease services and other health extension programme services in Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis.

Azeb Gebresilassie Tesema, David Peiris, Rohina Joshi, Seye Abimbola, Fasil Walelign Fentaye, Alula M Teklu, Yohannes Kinfu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Azeb Gebresilassie TesemaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia azeb18@gmail.com.
David PeirisThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6898-3870
Rohina JoshiSchool of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Seye AbimbolaThe George Institute for Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1294-3850
Fasil Walelign FentayeMonitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Quality Improvement (MERQ), Ethiopia office, MERQ Consultancy PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Alula M TekluMonitoring, Evaluation, Research, and Quality Improvement (MERQ), Ethiopia office, MERQ Consultancy PLC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Yohannes KinfuDepartment of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEthiopia has recently revitalised its health extension programme (HEP) to address the rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). We examined the effects of existing essential HEP services on the uptake of NCD preventive services.

methodsWe applied a mixed-effect non-linear model with a logit link function to identify factors associated with a community resident's probability of receiving NCD prevention services through the HEP. The data were drawn from the Ethiopian HEP assessment Survey conducted in all regions. The analysis included 9680 community residents, 261 health extension workers (HEWs), 153 health posts, 119 health centres, 55 districts and 9 regions, which we combined hierarchically into a single database.

resultsIn the 12 months before the survey, 22% of the sample population reported receiving NCD preventive service at least once. The probability of receiving NCD prevention service increased by up to 25% (OR=1.25, CI 1.01 to 1.53) if health centres routinely gathered NCD data from health posts and by up to 48% (OR=.48, CI 1.24 to 1.78) if they provided general (ie, non-NCD specific) training to HEWs. NCD preventive service uptake also increased if the HEW held level IV qualification (OR=1.32, CI 1.06 to 1.65) and lived in the community (OR=1.24, CI 1.03 to 1.49). Conversely, if facilities delayed general performance reviews of HEWs by a month, uptake of NCD prevention services decreased by 6% (OR=0.94, CI 0.91 to 0.97). We observed that better HIV/AIDS programme performance was associated with a lower uptake of NCD preventive services (OR=0.15, CI 0.03 to 0.85).

conclusionDespite efforts to improve NCD services through the HEP, the coverage remains limited. A strong HEP is good for the uptake of NCD preventive services. However, integration requires a careful balance, so that the success already recorded for some existing programmes is not lost.

Indexed as

Community Health WorkersNoncommunicable DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaHealth PromotionHumansMultilevel AnalysisCommunity-based surveyHealth policies and all other topicsHealth services researchHealth systemsHealth systems evaluation

Identifiers

PMID35738842
PMCPMC9226884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.