Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738671›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022

Adding MR Diffusion Imaging and T2 Signal Intensity to Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System Categories 2 and 3 in Primary Sites of Postsurgical Oral Cavity Carcinoma Provides Incremental Diagnostic Value.

A Jajodia, G Mandal, V Yadav, J Khoda, J Goyal, S Pasricha, S Puri, A Dewan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. NI-RADS in posttreatment head and neck cancer surveillance: a framework for standardized imaging with clinical impact.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026
    Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A JajodiaFrom the Department of Radiology (A.J., J.K., J.G., S.Puri) ankushjaj@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7689-9484
G MandalSurgical Oncology (G.M., V.Y., A.D.).
V YadavSurgical Oncology (G.M., V.Y., A.D.).
J KhodaFrom the Department of Radiology (A.J., J.K., J.G., S.Puri).ORCID 0000-0003-1306-1091
J GoyalFrom the Department of Radiology (A.J., J.K., J.G., S.Puri).ORCID 0000-0001-9037-9031
S PasrichaLaboratory & Histopathology (S.Pasricha), Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-5655-5107
S PuriFrom the Department of Radiology (A.J., J.K., J.G., S.Puri).ORCID 0000-0002-9927-8576
A DewanSurgical Oncology (G.M., V.Y., A.D.).
Jisc · GBSociety of Surgical Oncology · USRajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe NI-RADS lexicon doesn't use ADC parameters and T2 weighted signal for ascribing categories. We explored ADC, DWI, and T2WI to examine the diagnostic accuracy in primary sites of postsurgical oral cavity carcinoma in the Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) categories 2 and 3. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis in clinically asymptomatic post-surgically treated patients with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who underwent contrast-enhanced MRI between January 2013 and January 2016. Histopathology and follow-up imaging were used to ascertain the presence or absence of malignancy in subjects with "new enhancing lesions," which were interpreted according to the NI-RADS lexicon by experienced readers, including NI-RADS 2 and 3 lesions in the primary site. NI-RADS that included T2WI and DWI (referred to as NI-RADS A) and ADC (using the best cutoff from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, NI-RADS B) was documented in an Excel sheet to up- or downgrade existing classic American College of Radiology NI-RADS and calculate diagnostic accuracy.

resultsSixty-one malignant and 23 benign lesions included in the study were assigned American College of Radiology NI-RADS 2 (

conclusionsAdding MR imaging diagnostic characteristics like T2WI, DWI, and ADC to the American College of Radiology NI-RADS improved diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsMagnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMouthRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Identifiers

PMID35738671
PMCPMC9262069
OpenAlexW4283327863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.