Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738657›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Current knowledge on spinal meningiomas: a systematic review protocol.

Victor Gabriel El-Hajj, Jenny Pettersson Segerlind, Gustav Burström, Erik Edström, Adrian Elmi-Terander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Victor Gabriel El-HajjDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden victor.gabriel.elhajj@stud.ki.se.ORCID 0000-0001-9479-761X
Jenny Pettersson SegerlindDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Gustav BurströmDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik EdströmDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8781-1169
Adrian Elmi-TeranderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3776-6136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMeningiomas are primary central nervous system tumours that arise from both cranial and spinal meninges. Spinal meningiomas occur less frequently than their cranial counterparts and are consequently given less attention in the literature. Therefore, systematic studies are needed to summarise the current knowledge on spinal meningiomas, providing a solid evidence base for treatment strategies. This systematic review of the literature will therefore assess studies describing spinal meningiomas, their epidemiology, diagnostics, treatment and outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science and Embase, will be searched using the keywords "spinal" and "meningioma". The search will be set to provide only English studies published after 2000 to avoid any conflicts regarding terminology and classification, as well as to reflect the current status. Case reports, editorials, letters and reviews will also be excluded. Reference lists of relevant records will also be searched. Identified studies will be screened for inclusion, by one reviewer in a first step and then three in the next step to decrease the risk of bias. The results will be categorised to allow for a structured summary of the outcomes and their evidence grade conforming to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Categories may include: epidemiology, histopathology, radiological diagnostics, surgery, complications, non-surgical or adjuvant treatments, disease outcomes and predictors, and lastly recurrence. This review will summarise the current knowledge on spinal meningiomas to allow for a better understanding of the disease and contribute to improve its management. For clinicians, the systematic collection and grading of available evidence may aid in decision making and for those seeking to further the scientific field, this review may help to identify areas where knowledge is currently lacking. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required for our systematic review as it is based on existing publications. The results will be disseminated via submission for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

Indexed as

Meningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaHumansResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as Topicneurological oncologyneurosurgeryoncologyspine

Identifiers

PMID35738657
PMCPMC9226977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.