ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Mode of Referral of Ovarian Cancer Patients: Does it Alter Treatment and Survival?
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimSome studies have shown that ovarian cancer patients admitted after referral to the emergency department had a worse prognosis than those referred through non-emergency pathways. We believe that our study is the first in the UK to explore this difference and aimed to compare the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival rates of ovarian cancer patients referred non-urgently from the general practitioner (GP) vs. patients referred urgently to the emergency department (ED). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the University Hospitals of Leicester (UHL) from 1
resultsThere was no significant difference in the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year overall survival in ovarian cancer patients referred from the GP compared to patients referred to the ED, 84.8%, 62.2%, and 48.4% versus 80.2%, 64.8%, and 43.5%, respectively (p=0.732).
conclusionThe mode of referral for ovarian cancer patients may not affect their prognosis. Prompt referral to the gynaecological oncology multidisciplinary team, a good acute oncology service, early imaging and image-guided diagnostic pathways, timely appointment, and timely initiation of treatment in our centre may have minimized the difference in outcome in the two groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.