Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738587›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Determination of

Cumhur Kaan Yaltirik, Seda Gulec Yilmaz, Selcuk Ozdogan, Ezel Yaltirik Bilgin, Zerrin Barut, Ugur Ture, Turgay Isbir

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Correlations ofMolecular and clinical oncology · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unraveling the Impact ofIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cumhur Kaan YaltirikDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ümraniye Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey; dr_cky@yahoo.com.
Seda Gulec YilmazDepartment of Medical Biology, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Selcuk OzdoganDepartment of Neurosurgery, Haliç University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ezel Yaltirik BilginDepartment of Radiology, Dr. Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Zerrin BarutDepartment of Basic Medical Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Antalya Bilim University, Antalya, Turkey.
Ugur TureDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Turgay IsbirDepartment of Medical Biology, Yeditepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Yeditepe University · TRAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRAntalya Bilim University · TRHaliç University · TRÜmraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimThe most frequent and dangerous kind of primary brain tumor is glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The survival rates associated with GBM are very short and molecular markers for predicting survival are needed. The aim of our study was to evaluate isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1, IDH2), telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), O-6- methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and alpha-thalassemia/mental retardation, X-linked (ATRX) genes with next-generation sequencing (NGS) to find potential pathological mutations and their effect on survival. MATERIALS AND

methodsThirty patients who had undergone craniotomy and were diagnosed with high-grade glioma were evaluated for this study. Peripheral blood samples were obtained from all participants. IDH1, IDH2, TERT, MGMT and ATRX genes were evaluated with next-generation sequencing from the samples. Survival analysis evaluated the effects of all these mutations on survival.

resultsThe median age of the patients was 58.5 (range=11- 74) years, and 56.7% (n=17) were under 60 years of age. According to sex, male patients comprised 66.7%. Targeted NGS detected 21 chromosomal aberrations. When more than three chromosomal anomalies were accepted as a reference, anomaly in three or fewer chromosomes negatively affected overall survival (hazard ratio=2.83).

conclusionTargeted NGS generates therapeutically meaningful information, providing better prognostic information than conventional histology. Our study shows that NGS provides important information on survival by helping to detect chromosomal changes that can be detected in routine blood samples. It is clear that incorporating molecular diagnostics into our standard-of-care routine will help us better understand our patients' outcomes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaTelomeraseAdolescentAdultAgedChildDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesFemaleHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedMutationATRX protein, humanDNA Modification MethylasesDNA Repair EnzymesIDH1 protein, humanIDH2 protein, humanIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMGMT protein, humanTelomeraseTERT protein, humanTumor Suppressor ProteinsX-linked Nuclear ProteinATRXglioblastomaIDH1IDH2MGMTmolecular biologyNext-generation sequencingTERT

Identifiers

PMID35738587
PMCPMC9301419
OpenAlexW4283447686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.