Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738498›Full record

ArticleCognitive science2022

Musical Garden Paths: Evidence for Syntactic Revision Beyond the Linguistic Domain.

Gabriele Cecchetti, Steffen A Herff, Martin A Rohrmeier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gabriele CecchettiDigital and Cognitive Musicology Lab, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.ORCID 0000-0002-1486-1886
Steffen A HerffDigital and Cognitive Musicology Lab, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.ORCID 0000-0001-8396-1306
Martin A RohrmeierDigital and Cognitive Musicology Lab, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While theoretical and empirical insights suggest that the capacity to represent and process complex syntax is crucial in language as well as other domains, it is still unclear whether specific parsing mechanisms are also shared across domains. Focusing on the musical domain, we developed a novel behavioral paradigm to investigate whether a phenomenon of syntactic revision occurs in the processing of tonal melodies under analogous conditions as in language. We present the first proof-of-existence for syntactic revision in a set of tonally ambiguous melodies, supporting the relevance of syntactic representations and parsing with language-like characteristics in a nonlinguistic domain. Furthermore, we find no evidence for a modulatory effect of musical training, suggesting that a general cognitive capacity, rather than explicit knowledge and strategies, may underlie the observed phenomenon in music.

Indexed as

MusicAuditory PerceptionHumansLanguageLinguisticsAmbiguityMusic and languageReanalysisRevisionSyntactic processingSyntax

Identifiers

PMID35738498
PMCPMC9286404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.