ArticleAnnals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft2022
Evaluation of the effectiveness of online education in anatomy for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Relationship Between Sense of Community and Collaborative Learning: Quantitative Study in Medical Education.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- A global overview of anatomical science education and its present and future role in biomedical curricula.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
- Article
- From pandemic to earthquakes: crisis-driven challenges in distance anatomy education.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- From Cadavers to Codes: The Evolution of Anatomy Education Through Digital Technologies.Medical science educator · 2025Review
- A Systematic Scoping Review of the Current Applications of Digital Technology in Undergraduate Surgical Education.Cureus · 2025Review
- Review
- Telemedicine-medical "snack community"-PHS ecosystem: Insights into the double-edged sword role of telemedicine in clinical practice and medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the field of medicine, anatomy is considered one of the most important subjects to be studied in college, even for clinicians. Learning from cadaveric specimens is considered an important part of the medical experience. The current study consisted of a questionnaire given to Year 1 and Year 2 medical students. This study was performed to assess using a questionnaire whether students were capable of continuing studying Anatomy during the COVID-19 period.
methodsThe study consisted of 102 students in Years 1 and 2 of the Faculty of Medicine of Alexandria University in Egypt. It included Year 1 Students (mean age 18.6 ± 1.1 years old; 21 males and 36 females), and Year 2 Students (mean age 20.4 ± 1.0 years old; 22 males and 23 females). The survey consisted of three sections. The first section consisted of four questions on the demographic data of the participating students. The second section consisted of 10 questions concerning their satisfaction with the tutorials and presented by the Department of Anatomy. Answers to the questionnaire were in the form of a Likert scale (with 1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree).
resultsThe students disagreed with the fact that they found difficulty in time management, represented by a mean score of 2.23 ± 1.14. That is to say, the students were capable of managing their time well. Here also, the difference between Year 1 and Year 2 students was significant (p = 0.028), which is an indicator that Year 2 students found more difficulty in time management. Most students agreed (mean score of 3.48 ± 1.07) that they were able to handle online learning and the transition between the systems was acceptable. Students were also convinced and agreed that the methods used by the college limited the spread of COVID-19 (mean score of 3.81 ± 1.04). Allowing assignments and projects increased the interaction between the students and the staff members.
conclusionsEducation must continue during the COVID-19 period, based on their responses and opinions in the questionnaire. Online learning proved to be effective in teaching medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.