Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35738293›Full record

ReviewSeminars in neurology2022

Neuroethics across the Disorders of Consciousness Care Continuum.

Michael J Young, Andrew Peterson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Disorders of Consciousness Rehabilitation: Ethical Dimensions and Epistemic Dilemmas.Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America · 2024
    Review
  11. Covert consciousness.NeuroRehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael J YoungDivision of Neurocritical Care, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Andrew PetersonInstitute for Philosophy and Public Policy and Department of Philosophy, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia.

Funding

Caregivers' Experiences with and Perspectives on Communication with Persons with DementiaR21AG069805 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KARLAWISH, JASON H, PETERSON, ANDREW H · 2020 to 2021
$452k
An Ethical Approach to Detecting Covert ConsciousnessF32MH123001 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI YOUNG, MICHAEL J · 2020 to 2022
$159k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG069805NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH123001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review provides an ethical analysis of disorders of consciousness (DoC) along the care continuum, from preinjury to injury, acute care to subacute care and early rehabilitation, and finally transitioning to chronic rehabilitation and societal reintegration. We provide an actionable, chronological assessment of ethical issues related to DoC care. This expands upon established ethics literature, which focuses almost exclusively on the clinical encounter for DoC. Our goal is to broaden the aperture of ethical analysis to address how social and environmental conditions predispose some persons to brain injury, and how such conditions might also pose barriers to meaningful societal reintegration after recovery.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesNeurosciencesConsciousnessConsciousness DisordersContinuity of Patient CareHumans

Identifiers

PMID35738293
PMCPMC13650762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.