Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737963›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Estimating 3-D whole-body composition from a chest CT scan.

Lucy Pu, Syed F Ashraf, Naciye S Gezer, Iclal Ocak, Daniel E Dresser, Joseph K Leader, Rajeev Dhupar

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. CT-Derived Features as Predictors of Clot Burden and Resolution.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy PuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Syed F AshrafDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Naciye S GezerDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Iclal OcakDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel E DresserDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Joseph K LeaderDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Rajeev DhuparDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USAllegheny College · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
CSRD VA IK2 CX001771NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904VA Career Development Award CX001771-01A2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEstimating whole-body composition from limited region-computed tomography (CT) scans has many potential applications in clinical medicine; however, it is challenging. PURPOSE: To investigate if whole-body composition based on several tissue types (visceral adipose tissue [VAT], subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT], intermuscular adipose tissue [IMAT], skeletal muscle [SM], and bone) can be reliably estimated from a chest CT scan only.

methodsA cohort of 97 lung cancer subjects who underwent both chest CT scans and whole-body positron emission tomography-CT scans at our institution were collected. We used our in-house software to automatically segment and quantify VAT, SAT, IMAT, SM, and bone on the CT images. The field-of-views of the chest CT scans and the whole-body CT scans were standardized, namely, from vertebra T1 to L1 and from C1 to the bottom of the pelvis, respectively. Multivariate linear regression was used to develop the computer models for estimating the volumes of whole-body tissues from chest CT scans. Subject demographics (e.g., gender and age) and lung volume were included in the modeling analysis. Ten-fold cross-validation was used to validate the performance of the prediction models. Mean absolute difference (MAD) and R-squared (R

resultsThe R

conclusionOur algorithm shows promise in its ability to estimate whole-body compositions from chest CT scans. Body composition measures based on chest CT scans are more accurate than those based on vertebra third lumbar.

Indexed as

TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedBody CompositionHumansbody compositionchestcomputed tomographyprediction modelswhole-body

Identifiers

PMID35737963
PMCPMC10084085
OpenAlexW4283362851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.