Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737876›Full record

ArticleOrthodontics & craniofacial research2023

Three-dimensional comparison of bone-borne and tooth-bone-borne maxillary expansion in young adults with maxillary skeletal deficiency.

Martina Bazzani, Lucia H S Cevidanes, Najla N Al Turkestani, Fabio Annarumma, Craig McMullen, Antonio C O Ruellas, Camila Massaro, Marcus V N N Rego, Marilia S Yatabe, Hera Kim-Berman and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthodontics & craniofacial research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 12 institutions in 5 countries.

Martina BazzaniSchool of Dentistry, Genova University, Genoa, Italy.
Lucia H S CevidanesDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9786-2253
Najla N Al TurkestaniDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7650-3638
Fabio AnnarummaPrivate Practice of Orthodontics, Rome, Italy.
Craig McMullenPrivate Practice of Orthodontics, Brighton, Michigan, USA.
Antonio C O RuellasDepartment of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Camila MassaroDepartment of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcus V N N RegoDepartment of Orthodontics, Centero Universitário Uninovafapi, Teresina, Brazil.
Marilia S YatabeDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8748-6714
Hera Kim-BermanDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-3700
James A McNamaraDepartment of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Lorenzo FranchiDepartment of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7444-5190
Peter NganDepartment of Orthodontics, West Virginia University School of Dentistry, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA.
Hong HeDepartment of Orthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Fernanda AngelieriDepartment of Orthodontics, Methodist University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hussein AghazadaPrivate Practice of Orthodontics, Rome, Italy.
Marco MiglioratiDepartment of Orthodontics, Genoa University School of Dentistry, Genoa, Italy.
University of Michigan · USAmerican Association of Orthodontists · USUniversity of Genoa · ITBrighton Hospital · USCentro Universitário UNINOVAFAPI · BRKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Metodista de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Florence · ITWest Virginia University · USWuhan University · CN

Funding

Quantification of 3D Bony Changes in Temporomandibular Joint OsteoarthritisR01DE024450 · NIDCR · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Lucia H Cevidanes · 2013 to 2026
$5.5M
Role of inflammation in resistance to EGFR inhibitors in head and neck cancerR01DE024550 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI BURNETT, ANDREAN LLEWELA · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024450NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the transverse dental and skeletal changes in patients treated with bone-anchored palatal expander (bone-borne, BB) compared to patients treated with tooth and bone-anchored palatal expanders (tooth-bone-borne, TBB) using cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT) and 3D image analysis.

methodsThe sample comprised 30 patients with transverse maxillary discrepancy treated with two different types of appliances: bone-borne (Group BB) and tooth-bone-borne (Group TBB) expanders. CBCT scans were acquired before (T1) and after completion of maxillary expansion (T2); the interval was 5.4 ± 3.4 and 6.2 ± 2.1 months between the T1 and the T2 scans of Group TBB (tooth-bone-borne) and Group BB (bone-borne), respectively. Transverse, anteroposterior and vertical linear and angular three-dimensional dentoskeletal changes were assessed after cranial base superimposition.

resultsBoth groups displayed marked transverse skeletal expansion with a greater ratio of skeletal to dental changes. Greater changes at the nasal cavity, zygoma and orbital levels were found in Group BB. A relatively parallel sutural opening in an anterior-posterior direction was observed in Group TBB; however, the Group BB presented a somewhat triangular (V-shaped) opening of the suture that was wider anteriorly. Small downward-forward displacements were observed in both groups. Asymmetric expansion occurred in approximately 50% of the patients in both groups.

conclusionGreater skeletal vs dental expansion ratio and expansion of the circummaxillary regions were found in Group BB, the group in which a bone-borne expander was used. Both groups presented skeletal and dental changes, with a similar amount of posterior palate expansion. Asymmetric expansion was observed in both groups.

Indexed as

Palatal Expansion TechniqueToothCone-Beam Computed TomographyHumansMaxillaPalateYoung Adultbone-borne expandermaxillary expansionminiscrewtooth-bone-borne expander

Identifiers

PMID35737876
PMCPMC10257795
OpenAlexW4283326149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.