Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737867›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

Brain age as a surrogate marker for cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis.

Stijn Denissen, Denis Alexander Engemann, Alexander De Cock, Lars Costers, Johan Baijot, Jorne Laton, Iris-Katharina Penner, Matthias Grothe, Michael Kirsch, Marie Beatrice D'hooghe and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Advances in Neurodegenerative Diseases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Stijn DenissenAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2852-5530
Denis Alexander EngemannUniversité Paris-Saclay, Inria, CEA, Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7223-1014
Alexander De CockAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-8641-054X
Lars CostersAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-8061
Johan BaijotAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1108-7845
Jorne LatonAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4215-6524
Iris-Katharina PennerCogito Center for Applied Neurocognition and Neuropsychological Research, Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6746-1034
Matthias GrotheDepartment of Neurology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7998-5310
Michael KirschInstitute for Diagnostic Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medicine of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Marie Beatrice D'hoogheNational Multiple Sclerosis Center Melsbroek, Melsbroek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0917-4176
Miguel D'HaeseleerNational Multiple Sclerosis Center Melsbroek, Melsbroek, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-0089
Dominique DiveDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital of Liege, Esneux, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-9791
Johan De MeyDepartment of Radiology, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-3212
Jeroen Van SchependomAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-1200-5872
Diana Maria SimaAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-0118-2905
Guy NagelsAIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-2597-0383

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeData from neuro-imaging techniques allow us to estimate a brain's age. Brain age is easily interpretable as 'how old the brain looks' and could therefore be an attractive communication tool for brain health in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate its clinical utility by investigating the relationship between brain age and cognitive performance in multiple sclerosis (MS).

methodsA linear regression model was trained to predict age from brain magnetic resonance imaging volumetric features and sex in a healthy control dataset (HC_train, n = 1673). This model was used to predict brain age in two test sets: HC_test (n = 50) and MS_test (n = 201). Brain-predicted age difference (BPAD) was calculated as BPAD = brain age minus chronological age. Cognitive performance was assessed by the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).

resultsBrain age was significantly related to SDMT scores in the MS_test dataset (r = -0.46, p < 0.001) and contributed uniquely to variance in SDMT beyond chronological age, reflected by a significant correlation between BPAD and SDMT (r = -0.24, p < 0.001) and a significant weight (-0.25, p = 0.002) in a multivariate regression equation with age.

conclusionsBrain age is a candidate biomarker for cognitive dysfunction in MS and an easy to grasp metric for brain health.

Indexed as

Cognitive DysfunctionMultiple SclerosisBiomarkersBrainCognitionHumansNeuropsychological TestsBiomarkersbiomarkersbrain agecognitionmachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmultiple sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID35737867
PMCPMC9541923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.