Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737841›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Passage of exogeneous fine particles from the lung into the brain in humans and animals.

Yu Qi, Shuting Wei, Tao Xin, Chuanjiang Huang, Yichen Pu, Jinzhu Ma, Changbin Zhang, Yajun Liu, Iseult Lynch, Sijin Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Urban PMMolecular neurobiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Circular RNAEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Risk of PMiScience · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. PMAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu QiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4862-5347
Shuting WeiState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Tao XinDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8797-3002
Chuanjiang HuangDepartment of Neurosurgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China.
Yichen PuDepartment of Imaging, Jiangsu Huajing Molecular Imaging & Drug Research Institutes Co., Ltd., Changshu 215500, China.
Jinzhu MaState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1878-0669
Changbin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Yajun LiuBeijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, Beijing 100035, China.
Iseult LynchSchool of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-4250-4584
Sijin LiuState Key Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5643-0734

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are still significant knowledge gaps in understanding the intrusion and retention of exogeneous particles into the central nervous system (CNS). Here, we uncovered various exogeneous fine particles in human cerebrospinal fluids (CSFs) and identified the ambient environmental or occupational exposure sources of these particles, including commonly found particles (e.g., Fe- and Ca-containing ones) and other compositions that have not been reported previously (such as malayaite and anatase TiO

Indexed as

BrainLungParticulate MatterAnimalsBloodHumansMiceParticle SizeTissue DistributionParticulate Matterair pollutionambient exposurebrain healthparticle retentionparticulate matters

Identifiers

PMID35737841
PMCPMC9245667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.