ArticlePLoS computational biology2022
Ten simple rules for good research practice.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Evidence of unreliable data and poor data provenance in clinical prediction model research and clinical practice.BMC medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Ten simple rules for effective research data management.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Clinical Pathology-An Introduction and Review.Veterinary clinical pathology · 2025Review
- Article
- WERF Endometriosis Phenome and Biobanking Harmonisation Project for Experimental Models in Endometriosis Research (EPHect-EM-Pain): methods to assess pain behaviour in rodent models of endometriosis.Molecular human reproduction · 2025Review
- Small-Scale Interventions Improving Literature Search Skills Among Resident Doctors: An Observational Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Describing the landscape of nutrition- and diet-related randomized controlled trials: metaresearch study of protocols published between 2012 and 2022.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2025Article
- Advice to early career nutritionists on working in and with the food industry.Nutrition bulletin · 2025Article
- Refining Established Practices for Research Question Definition to Foster Interdisciplinary Research Skills in a Digital Age: Consensus Study With Nominal Group Technique.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Reporting checklists in neuroimaging: promoting transparency, replicability, and reproducibility.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Review
- Gene signatures for cancer research: A 25-year retrospective and future avenues.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for successfully carrying out funded research projects.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Efficacy of a Multistrain Synbiotic Treatment in Acute and Post-Acute COVID-19 Patients: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Evidence of questionable research practices in clinical prediction models.BMC medicine · 2023Article
- Establishing effective cross-disciplinary collaboration: Combining simple rules for reproducible computational research, a good data management plan, and good research practice.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Obtaining miRNA from Saliva-Comparison of Sampling and Purification Methods.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.