Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737640›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2022

Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists.

Carla Bautista, Narjes Alfuraiji, Anna Drangowska-Way, Karishma Gangwani, Alida de Flamingh, Philip E Bourne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carla BautistaEarly Career Scientist Communication and Outreach Subcommittee, Genetics Society of America, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3456-6566
Narjes AlfuraijiEarly Career Scientist Communication and Outreach Subcommittee, Genetics Society of America, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5338-6443
Anna Drangowska-WayEarly Career Scientist Communication and Outreach Subcommittee, Genetics Society of America, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.
Karishma GangwaniEarly Career Scientist Communication and Outreach Subcommittee, Genetics Society of America, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2986-4481
Alida de FlaminghEarly Career Scientist Communication and Outreach Subcommittee, Genetics Society of America, Rockville, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1223-6654
Philip E BourneSchool of Data Science, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7618-7292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Communication is a fundamental part of scientific development and methodology. With the advancement of the internet and social networks, communication has become rapid and sometimes overwhelming, especially in science. It is important to provide scientists with useful, effective, and dynamic tools to establish and build a fluid communication framework that allows for scientific advancement. Therefore, in this article, we present advice and recommendations that can help promote and improve science communication while respecting an adequate balance in the degree of commitment toward collaborative work. We have developed 10 rules shown in increasing order of commitment that are grouped into 3 key categories: (1) speak (based on active participation); (2) join (based on joining scientific groups); and (3) assess (based on the analysis and retrospective consideration of the weaknesses and strengths). We include examples and resources that provide actionable strategies for involvement and engagement with science communication, from basic steps to more advanced, introspective, and long-term commitments. Overall, we aim to help spread science from within and encourage and engage scientists to become involved in science communication effectively and dynamically.

Indexed as

CommunicationSocial NetworkingRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35737640
PMCPMC9223317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.