Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737473›Full record

ReviewQualitative health research2022

How Culture Shapes Informal Caregiver Motivations: A Meta-Ethnographic Review.

Mikołaj Zarzycki, Diane Seddon, Eva Bei, Rachel Dekel, Val Morrison

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Qualitative health research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
21.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Latino family caregivers: "it's what we do-we take care of our own".The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Burden of Informal Caregivers from an HHC Military Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  19. The current state and future direction of childcare for cancer patients: a narrative review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mikołaj ZarzyckiSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, College of Human Sciences, 1506Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8357-563X
Diane SeddonSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, 1506Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0660-4839
Eva BeiDepartment of Psychology, 26731Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-3093-0829
Rachel DekelSchool of Social Work, 26731Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7082-0456
Val MorrisonSchool of Human and Behavioural Sciences, College of Human Sciences, 1506Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4308-8976
Bangor University · GBBar-Ilan University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The provision of informal care presents a significant global challenge. To better understand how cultural factors underpin and shape motivations and willingness to provide informal care for adults, an in-depth qualitative synthesis was conducted. Six electronic databases and a wide range of additional sources were searched. Following meta-ethnographic guidelines, 37 qualitative studies were synthesised. Six main concepts were identified: cultural self-identity, which appeared as an overarching explanatory concept; cultural duty and obligations; cultural values; love and emotional attachments; repayment and reciprocity; and competing demands and roles. These concepts informed a model of cultural caregiving motivations, offering an inductive-based exploration of key cultural motivators and highlighting implications for theory development, future research, policy and practice. The model holds implications for the actual exchange of care. Caregiver motivations should not be taken for granted by healthcare or social care professionals involved in assessment and support planning, educational endeavours at a population level may support caregiving, and support should be sensitive to cultural caregiving motivations.

Indexed as

Anthropology, CulturalCaregiversAdultHumansMotivationQualitative ResearchSocial Supportcultureinformal caregivingmeta-ethnographymotivations to provide careself-identitysystematic reviewwillingness to provide care

Identifiers

PMID35737473
PMCPMC9411702
OpenAlexW4283378823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.