Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737416›Full record

ReviewVision (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Illusional Perspective across Humans and Bees.

Elia Gatto, Olli J Loukola, Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini, Christian Agrillo, Simone Cutini

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vision (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elia GattoDepartment of Chemical, Pharmaceutical and Agricultural Sciences, University of Ferrara, 44121 Ferrara, Italy.
Olli J LoukolaEcology and Genetics Research Unit, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9094-2004
Maria Elena Miletto PetrazziniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Christian AgrilloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7391-8934
Simone CutiniDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Ferrara · ITUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

Kone Foundation 202010852Ministry of Education, Universities and Research 2015FFATB7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For two centuries, visual illusions have attracted the attention of neurobiologists and comparative psychologists, given the possibility of investigating the complexity of perceptual mechanisms by using relatively simple patterns. Animal models, such as primates, birds, and fish, have played a crucial role in understanding the physiological circuits involved in the susceptibility of visual illusions. However, the comprehension of such mechanisms is still a matter of debate. Despite their different neural architectures, recent studies have shown that some arthropods, primarily Hymenoptera and Diptera, experience illusions similar to those humans do, suggesting that perceptual mechanisms are evolutionarily conserved among species. Here, we review the current state of illusory perception in bees. First, we introduce bees' visual system and speculate which areas might make them susceptible to illusory scenes. Second, we review the current state of knowledge on misperception in bees (Apidae), focusing on the visual stimuli used in the literature. Finally, we discuss important aspects to be considered before claiming that a species shows higher cognitive ability while equally supporting alternative hypotheses. This growing evidence provides insights into the evolutionary origin of visual mechanisms across species.

Indexed as

beesinvertebratesvisual illusionvisual perception

Identifiers

PMID35737416
PMCPMC9231007
OpenAlexW4281956574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.