Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737385›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Adaptive Dynamic Therapy and Survivorship for Operable Pancreatic Cancer.

Samer AlMasri, Mazen Zenati, Abdulrahman Hammad, Ibrahim Nassour, Hao Liu, Melissa E Hogg, Herbert J Zeh, Brian Boone, Nathan Bahary, Aatur D Singhi and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Errors in Figure 2.JAMA network open · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Samer AlMasriDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Mazen ZenatiDepartment of Surgery, Epidemiology, Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Abdulrahman HammadDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ibrahim NassourDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida, Gainesville.
Hao LiuDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Melissa E HoggDepartment of Surgery, NorthShore Hospital System, Chicago, Illinois.
Herbert J ZehDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas.
Brian BooneDepartment of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown.
Nathan BaharyDepartment of Internal Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Aatur D SinghiDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kenneth K LeeDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alessandro PanicciaDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Amer H ZureikatDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh · USAllegheny Health Network · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Neoadjuvant therapy is increasingly used in localized pancreatic carcinoma, and survival is correlated with carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels and histopathologic response following neoadjuvant therapy. With several regimens now available, the choice of chemotherapy could be best dictated by response to neoadjuvant therapy (as measured by CA19-9 levels and/or pathologic response), a strategy defined herein as adaptive dynamic therapy. Objective: To evaluate the association of adaptive dynamic therapy with oncologic outcomes in patients with surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with localized pancreatic cancer who were treated with either gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel or fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) preoperatively between 2010 and 2019 at a high-volume tertiary care academic center. Participants were identified from a prospectively maintained database and had a median follow-up of 49 months. Data were analyzed from October 17 to November 24, 2020. Exposures: The adaptive dynamic therapy group included 219 patients who remained on or switched to an alternative regimen as dictated by CA19-9 response and for whom the adjuvant regimen was selected based on CA19-9 and/or pathologic response. The nonadaptive dynamic therapy group included 103 patients who had their chemotherapeutic regimen selected independent of CA19-9 and/or tumoral response. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prognostic implications of dynamic perioperative therapy assessed through Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and inverse probability weighted estimators. Results: A total of 322 consecutive patients (mean [SD] age, 65.1 [9] years; 162 [50%] women) were identified. The adaptive dynamic therapy group, compared with the nonadaptive dynamic therapy group, had a more pronounced median (IQR) decrease in CA19-9 levels (-80% [-92% to -56%] vs -45% [-81% to -13%]; P < .001), higher incidence of complete or near-complete tumoral response (25 [12%] vs 2 [2%]; P = .007), and lower median (IQR) number of lymph node metastasis (1 [0 to 4] vs 2 [0 to 4]; P = .046). Overall survival was significantly improved in the dynamic group compared with the nondynamic group (38.7 months [95% CI, 34.0 to 46.7 months] vs 26.5 months [95% CI, 23.5 to 32.9 months]; P = .03), and on adjusted analysis, dynamic therapy was independently associated with improved survival (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.99; P = .04). On inverse probability weighted analysis of 320 matched patients, the average treatment effect of dynamic therapy was to increase overall survival by 11.1 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 20.7 months; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study that sought to evaluate the role of adaptive dynamic therapy in localized pancreatic cancer, selecting a chemotherapeutic regimen based on response to preoperative therapy was associated with improved survival. These findings support an individualized and in vivo assessment of response to perioperative therapy in pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCA-19-9 AntigenCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesSurvivorshipCA-19-9 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID35737385
PMCPMC9227002
OpenAlexW4283387108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.