ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2022
Characterization of Double-Strand Break Repair Protein Ku80 Location Within the Murine Retina.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-Term Porcine Retina Explants as an Alternative to In Vivo Experimentation.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To characterize the spatial distribution of the DNA-double strand break-repair protein Ku80 in the murine retina. Even though robust data exist on the complexity of DNA repair mechanisms in dividing cells in vitro, almost nothing is known about it in post-mitotic neurons or photoreceptors (PRs). This knowledge is an important prerequisite for in vivo therapeutic approaches by genome editing in retina and PRs. Recently, it was shown that mouse rod PRs are incapable of repairing double-strand breaks induced by radiation. Material and Methods: Retinae from wild-type, rd10, and RPGR-KI mouse lines were obtained and stained with antibodies against Ku80, and cellular markers CtBP2, beta-Dystropglycan, Lamin B, and peanut agglutinin. Organotypic explant cultures were generated and maintained for up to 10 days. Laser microdissection was performed to obtain photoreceptor nuclei, and Ku80 expression was compared to whole retina by real-time PCR (RT-PCR). Results: Strong Ku80 immunoreactivity was observed in rod but not cone photoreceptor terminals localized in the outer plexiform layer of the retina in all three mouse lines. During retinal explant culture, we observed that Ku80-positive globules translocate into the heterochromatin region of nuclei in the outer nuclear layer (ONL). By quantitative PCR, we showed upregulation of relative Ku80 expression in the ONL during wild-type retinal explant culture. Discussion: The unexpected localization of Ku80 to murine rod terminals indicates another tissue-specific modification to the canonical DNA repair mechanisms and warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.