ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2022
Center-for-Near Extended-Depth-of-Focus Soft Contact Lens for Myopia Control in Children: 1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04238897 (A Prospective Randomized Control Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ticon Aspherical Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lens on Myopia Control), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Prospective Randomized Control Study to Evaluate the Effect of Ticon Aspherical Daily Disposable Soft Contact Lens on Myopia Control
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of interventions for myopia control in children: A systematic review with network meta-analyses.Acta ophthalmologica · 2025Pooled it
- Interventions for myopia control in children: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Myopia prevention and control in children: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Eye (London, England) · 2023Pooled it
- Longitudinal changes in retinal image quality in school-aged children.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Current Evidence on Options and Efficacy of Combination Therapy for Myopia Control-A Narrative Review.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Power Profiles of an Extended Depth of Focus Contact Lens for Myopia Management.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Current and Emerging Strategies for Myopia Control in Children: A Comprehensive Evidence-Based Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Efficacy and safety of orthokeratology sequentially combined with escalating atropine concentrations for myopia control in children.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Influence of time-of-day and light wavelengths on ocular responses to defocus.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
- Current and emerging strategies for myopia control: a narrative review of optical, pharmacological, behavioural, and adjunctive therapies.Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Impact of phakic intraocular lens implantation on anxiety and depression in patients with high myopia.World journal of psychiatry · 2025Article
- IMI-Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression 2025.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Review
- Steroid-Responsive Intraocular Lens Deposits: A Case-Based Review of Diagnosis and Management.Cureus · 2025Review
- Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses for the Treatment of Myopia Progression in Children: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.Ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Axial Length Stabilization or Reduction in over 40% of Patients Wearing Extended Depth-of-Focus Contact Lenses.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- IMI 2023 Digest.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel extended-depth-of-focus (EDOF) soft contact lens for myopia control in children.
methodsA prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, contralateral-eye comparison clinical trial was conducted in 72 children (40 male and 32 female) aged 9 to 14 years, with each eye randomly selected to wear either an experimental EDOF contact lens or a single-vision control lens at least 8 h per day, 5 days a week, for 52 weeks. Each contact lens was worn and then replaced daily. Measurements including best-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), axial length (AXL), and keratometry were performed at weeks 1, 4, and 13, and every 13 weeks thereafter for 52 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the change in SER, measured using cycloplegic auto-refraction. The secondary outcome measure was the change in AXL.
resultsAt week 52, the mean change in SER was significantly lower with the experimental lens (-0.70 ± 0.49 D) than with the control lens (-0.88 ± 0.51 D; P < .001). The mean AXL elongation was significantly lower with the experimental lens (0.34 ± 0.19 mm) than with the control lens (0.38 ± 0.19 mm; P < .001). The EDOF lens reduced AXL and myopia progression by 10.5% and 20.5%, respectively. The change in SER, but no AXL, was significantly associated with EDOF lens wear in adjusted multivariate regression analysis. Reported adverse events did not differ significantly between the two lens types.
conclusionsThe results of this 1-year clinical trial demonstrate that the experimental EDOF soft contact lens slows myopia progression and reduces AXL elongation in children compared with a single-vision contact lens. (This study was retrospectively registered with ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT04238897; date of registration: January 23, 2020.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.