Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737274›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2022

Shift Work and Obesity Risk-Are There Sex Differences?

Kevin L Smith, Alexandria B Danyluk, Sanah S Munir, Naima Covassin

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kevin L SmithDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Alexandria B DanylukUniversity of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Sanah S MunirDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Naima CovassinDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Covassin.Naima@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0523-3615
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewShift work is prevalent among the working population and is linked to an array of adverse health outcomes. This review summarizes current evidence on the relation between shift work and risk of obesity, with a particular emphasis on potential sex differences. RECENT

findingsObservational data strongly point towards an association between shift work and heightened risk of prevalent and incident obesity, and particularly abdominal obesity. Circadian misalignment and unhealthy lifestyle behaviors are the primary culprits mediating such association. As it pertains to sex differences in the impact of shift work on obesity, few studies have examined this aspect, and findings are conflicting. Shift work is an important risk factor for obesity, with likely multiple biological and behavioral mediators. However, whether there is a sex-dependent vulnerability to the obesogenic effects of shift work is unclear. This area presents opportunities for future research.

Indexed as

Shift Work ScheduleCircadian RhythmFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleObesityRisk FactorsSex CharacteristicsCircadian misalignmentObesitySex differencesShift workWeight gain

Identifiers

PMID35737274
OpenAlexW4283328807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.