Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737252›Full record

SynthesisClinical & experimental metastasis2022

Intraperitoneal drug delivery systems releasing cytostatic agents to target gastro-intestinal peritoneal metastases in laboratory animals: a systematic review.

Anne G W E Wintjens, Geert A Simkens, Peter-Paul K H Fransen, Narcis Serafras, Kaatje Lenaerts, Gregor H L M Franssen, Ignace H J T de Hingh, Patricia Y W Dankers, Nicole D Bouvy, Andrea Peeters

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical & experimental metastasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Anne G W E WintjensNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. a.wintjens@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Geert A SimkensDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Peter-Paul K H FransenUPyTher BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Narcis SerafrasDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kaatje LenaertsNUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Gregor H L M FranssenDepartment of Education, Content & Support, University Library, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ignace H J T de HinghDepartment of Surgery, Catharina Hospital Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Patricia Y W DankersInstitute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Nicole D BouvyDepartment of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, PO Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Andrea PeetersDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLCatharina Ziekenhuis · NLEindhoven University of Technology · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For peritoneal metastases (PM), there are few curative treatment options, and they are only available for a select patient group. Recently, new therapies have been developed to deliver intraperitoneal chemotherapy for a prolonged period, suitable for a larger patient group. These drug delivery systems (DDSs) seem promising in the experimental setting. Many types of DDSs have been explored in a variety of animal models, using different cytostatics. This review aimed to provide an overview of animal studies using DDSs containing cytostatics for the treatment of gastro-intestinal PM and identify the most promising therapeutic combinations. The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and Systematic Review Center for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) guidelines. The 35 studies included revealed similar results: using a cytostatic-loaded DDS to treat PM resulted in a higher median survival time (MST) and a lower intraperitoneal tumor load compared to no treatment or treatment with a 'free' cytostatic or an unloaded DDS. In 65% of the studies, the MST was significantly longer and in 24% the tumor load was significantly lower in the animals treated with cytostatic-loaded DDS. The large variety of experimental setups made it impossible to identify the most promising DDS-cytostatic combination. In most studies, the risk of bias was unclear due to poor reporting. Future studies should focus more on improving the clinical relevance of the experiments, standardizing the experimental study setup, and improving their methodological quality and reporting.

Indexed as

Cytostatic AgentsGastrointestinal NeoplasmsPeritoneal NeoplasmsAnimalsDrug Delivery SystemsPeritoneumCytostatic AgentsAnimal experimentsDrug delivery systemsIntraperitoneal chemotherapyPeritoneal metastasesSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35737252
PMCPMC9338897
OpenAlexW4283326494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.