ReviewPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
Instruments to measure environmental and personal radiofrequency-electromagnetic field exposures: an update.
Review in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Estimating Environmental RF-EMF Exposure From Mobile Networks Using Signal Indicators Collected With the ETAIN 5G Scientist App.Bioelectromagnetics · 2026Article
- Precision Livestock Farming and Biomedical Engineering: Assessing Feed Quality, Animal Health, and Behavior Using Machine Learning for Sensor Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Low-Cost Sensors in 5G RF-EMF Exposure Monitoring: Validity and Challenges.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Radiofrequency Wave Sensing for Rapid Animal Health Monitoring: A Proof-of-Concept Study.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
- Weak Radiofrequency Field Effects on Biological Systems Mediated through the Radical Pair Mechanism.Chemical reviews · 2025Review
- 5G RF EMF Spectral Exposure Assessment in Four European Countries.Bioelectromagnetics · 2025Article
- Modeling Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field Wearable Distributed (Multi-Location) Measurements System for Evaluating Electromagnetic Hazards in the Work Environment.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Ambient RF-EMF exposure in surgical operating rooms from telecommunication antennas and Wi-Fi sources.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Determining the relationship between mobile phone network signal strength and radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure: protocol and pilot study to derive conversion functions.Open research Europe · 2024Article
- It is mandatory to review environmental radiofrequency electromagnetic field measurement protocols and exposure regulations: An opinion article.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern human populations are exposed to anthropogenic sources of radiofrequency-electromagnetic fields (RF-EMFs), primarily to telecommunication and broadcasting technologies. As a result, ongoing concerns from some members of the public have arisen regarding potential health effects following RF-EMF exposures. In order to monitor human RF-EMF exposures and investigate potential health effects, an objective assessment of RF-EMF exposures is necessary. Accurate dosimetry is essential for any investigation of potential associations between RF-EMF exposure and health effects in human populations. This review updates state-of-the-art knowledge of currently available RF-EMF exposure assessment tools applicable in human epidemiological studies. These tools cater for assessing RF-EMF exposures in human environments; through mobile phone-based tools or other standalone tools. RF-EMF exposure assessment has been significantly improved through the application of some of these tools in recent years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.