Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737215›Full record

ArticleOral radiology2023

Automated methods for sella turcica segmentation on cephalometric radiographic data using deep learning (CNN) techniques.

Kaushlesh Singh Shakya, Amit Laddi, Manojkumar Jaiswal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oral radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kaushlesh Singh ShakyaAcademy of Scientific and Innovative Research (AcSIR), Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
Amit LaddiCSIR-Central Scientific Instruments Organisation, Chandigarh, 160030, India.
Manojkumar JaiswalOral Health Sciences Centre, PGIMER, Chandigarh, 160012, India. drmanojjaiswal@yahoo.in.ORCID 0000-0002-0285-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this work is to present a novel technique using convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures for automatic segmentation of sella turcica (ST) on cephalometric radiographic image dataset. The proposed work suggests possible deep learning approaches to distinguish ST on complex cephalometric radiographs using deep learning techniques. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe dataset of 525 lateral cephalometric images was employed and randomly split into different training and testing subset ratios. The ground truth (annotated images) represents pixel-wise annotation of the ST using an online annotation platform by dental specialists. This study compared convolutional neural network architectures based on fine-tuned versions of the VGG19, ResNet34, InceptionV3, and ResNext50 architectures to select an appropriate model for autonomous segmentation of the nonlinear structure of ST.

resultsThe study compared training and prediction results of the selected models: VGG19, ResNet34, InceptionV3, and ResNext50. The mean IoU scores for VGG19, ResNet34, InceptionV3 and ResNext50 are 0.7651, 0.7241, 0.4717, 0.4287, dice coefficients are 0.7794, 0.7487, 0.4714, 0.4363 and loss scores are 0.0973, 0.1299, 0.2049 and 0.2251, respectively.

conclusionThe obtained findings suggest that the VGG19 and Resnet34 architectures (mean IoU and dice coefficient > 75%) comparatively outperformed the InceptionV3 and ResNext50 architectures (mean IoU and dice coefficients is around 45%) for considered cephalometric radiographic dataset. The study findings can be used as a reference model for future investigation of non-linear ST morphological characteristics and related biological anomalies.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerSella TurcicaCephalometric radiographsCNNDeep learningImage processingSegmentationSella turcica

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.