Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737159›Full record

ArticleBulletin of experimental biology and medicine2022

Pharmacokinetic Parameters of Oral Pegylated IFN-λ1.

E Yu Sherstoboev, L A Oleinik, V V Zhdanov, N A Kikhtenko, P G Madonov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

E Yu SherstoboevE. D. Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia. sherstoboev_eu@pharmso.ru.
L A OleinikResearch Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology - Affiliated Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
V V ZhdanovE. D. Goldberg Research Institute of Pharmacology and Regenerative Medicine, Tomsk National Research Medical Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Tomsk, Russia.
N A KikhtenkoResearch Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology - Affiliated Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.
P G MadonovResearch Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology - Affiliated Branch of Federal Research Center Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Division of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We studied the pharmacokinetics of a pegylated IFN-λ1 (PEG IFN-λ1) after its oral administration to rats in different therapeutic doses. The hypothesis on linear pharmacokinetics of PEG IFN-λ1 within the dose range of 2.6-7.8 μg/kg was confirmed, high for protein molecules bioavailability from 17.5 to 21%, the absence of intravascular deposition, and effective elimination with feces and urine (85 and 15% of the administered dose, respectively) were demonstrated. At the same time, the mean retention time for PEG IFN-λ1 in the circulation is 6.46-6.65 h and half-life is 3 h. These findings give ground for continuing experimental studies of PEG IFN-λ1 pharmacokinetics, in particular, tissue distribution of the drug.

Indexed as

InterferonsInterleukinsAnimalsPolyethylene GlycolsRatsRecombinant ProteinsTissue DistributionInterferonsInterleukinsPolyethylene GlycolsRecombinant Proteinsinterferon lambdapegylated interferon lambda 1 (PEG IFN-λ1)pharmacokinetic

Identifiers

PMID35737159
PMCPMC9218048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.