ArticleActa diabetologica2022
Search for a time- and cost-saving genetic testing strategy for maturity-onset diabetes of the young.
Article in Acta diabetologica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- High prevalence of maturity-onset diabetes of the young in the Czech Republic: A 25-year nationwide registry-based study.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2026Article
- Paediatric diabetes subtypes in a consanguineous population: a single-centre cohort study from Kurdistan, Iraq.Diabetologia · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
aimsCorrect genetic diagnosis of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) is beneficial for person's diabetes management compared to no genetic testing. Aim of the present study was a search for optimal time- and cost-saving strategies by comparing two approaches of genetic testing of participants with clinical suspicion of MODY.
methodsA total of 121 consecutive probands referred for suspicion of MODY (Group A) were screened using targeted NGS (tNGS), while the other 112 consecutive probands (Group B) underwent a single gene test based on phenotype, and in cases of negative findings, tNGS was conducted. The study was performed in two subsequent years. The genetic results, time until reporting of the final results and financial expenses were compared between the groups.
resultsMODY was confirmed in 30.6% and 40.2% probands from Groups A and B, respectively; GCK-MODY was predominant (72.2% in Group A and 77.8% in Group B). The median number of days until results reporting was 184 days (IQR 122-258) in Group A and 91 days (44-174) in Group B (p < 0.00001). Mean costs per person were higher for Group A (639 ± 30 USD) than for Group B (584 ± 296 USD; p = 0.044).
conclusionsThe two-step approach represented a better strategy for genetic investigation of MODY concerning time and costs compared to direct tNGS. Although a single-gene investigation clarified the diabetes aetiology in the majority of cases, tNGS could reveal rare causes of MODY and expose possible limitations of both standard genetic techniques and clinical evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.