Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35737017›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Planning revision hip arthroplasty : What are the structural requirements?]

Wolfram Mittelmeier, Katrin Osmanski-Zenk

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wolfram MittelmeierOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland. wolfram.mittelmeier@med.uni-rostock.de.
Katrin Osmanski-ZenkOrthopädische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Doberaner Str. 142, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The results of many studies and register reports show that the frequency of primary hip arthroplasty per hospital, but also per surgeon, influence the outcome. In the large spectrum of revision hip arthroplasty volume-outcome effects have also partially been proven. It is obvious that with the increasing complexity of revision surgery and comorbidities, higher demands exist concerning collaborating disciplines as well as training and intervention frequency of the surgical team. Further aspects regarding organisation and structure such as the availability of specific revision implants and instruments must be ensured. In order to provide sustainable resources for revision surgery in an arthroplasty centre, organization of education and training for staff members in different disciplines and working levels must be ensured without quality impairment.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipSurgeonsComorbidityHospitalsHumansReoperationHip prosthesis implantationMultimorbidityOperative proceduresPostoperative complicationsRevision surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.