Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35736994›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Hasini R Weerathunge, Tiffany Voon, Monique Tardif, Dante Cilento, Cara E Stepp

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Auditory-Motor Mechanisms of the Lombard Effect.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  2. Individual differences in speech monitoring: Functional and structural correlates of delayed auditory feedback.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Autonomic Arousal During Speech Production and Sensorimotor Adaptation.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Auditory imagery ability influences accuracy when singing with altered auditory feedback.Musicae scientiae : the journal of the European Society for the Cognitive Sciences of Music · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hasini R WeerathungeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA. hasiniw@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0240-9104
Tiffany VoonDepartment of Biology, Boston, MA, USA.
Monique TardifDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Dante CilentoDepartment of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Cara E SteppDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Sequencing and Initiation in Speech ProductionR01DC007683 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FRANK H GUENTHER · 2006 to 2026
$9.0M
Voice and Speech Sensorimotor Control in Parkinsons DiseaseR01DC016270 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI GUENTHER, FRANK H, STEPP, CARA E. · 2018 to 2022
$2.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC007683NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSpeech production is a complex motor task involving multiple subsystems. The relationships between these subsystems need to be comprehensively investigated to understand the underlying mechanisms of speech production. The goal of this paper is to examine the differential contributions of 1) auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems on speech motor control at an individual speaker level using altered auditory and somatosensory feedback paradigms.

methodsTwenty young adults completed speaking tasks in which sudden and unpredictable auditory and physical perturbations were applied to the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems. Auditory perturbations were applied to laryngeal or articulatory acoustic features of speech. Physical perturbations were applied to the larynx and the jaw. Pearson-product moment correlation coefficients were calculated between 1) auditory and somatosensory reflexive responses to investigate relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms, and 2) laryngeal and articulatory reflexive responses as well as acuity measures to investigate the relationship between auditory-motor features of laryngeal and articulatory subsystems.

resultsNo statistically significant correlations were found concerning the relationships between auditory and somatosensory feedback. No statistically significant correlations were found between auditory-motor features in the laryngeal and articulatory control subsystems.

conclusionResults suggest that the laryngeal and articulatory speech production subsystems operate with differential auditory and somatosensory feedback control mechanisms. The outcomes suggest that current models of speech motor control should consider decoupling laryngeal and articulatory domains to better model speech motor control processes.

Indexed as

LarynxSpeech PerceptionFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansSpeechYoung AdultAuditory feedbackSomatosensory feedbackSpeech motor control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.