ReviewToxics2022
A Review of Soil Contaminated with Dioxins and Biodegradation Technologies: Current Status and Future Prospects.
Review in Toxics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neurodegenerative diseases and environmental risk factors: an overview of the available scientific evidence.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- An Integrated Strategy for Sustainable Dioxin Remediation: Sources, Places of Contamination, and Toxicity.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Dioxins and the One Health Paradigm: An Interdisciplinary Challenge in Environmental Toxicology.Toxics · 2025Review
- Degradation of Dioxins and DBF in Urban Soil Microcosms from Lausanne (Switzerland): Functional Performance of Indigenous Bacterial Strains.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Soil to Synapse: Molecular Insights into the Neurotoxicity of Common Gardening Chemicals in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Microbial communities of selected regions of the Deep Springs Lake aquifer system.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Dioxins vs. PFAS: Science and Policy Challenges.Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- Polyextremophile engineering: a review of organisms that push the limits of life.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- The potential application of carbazole-degrading bacteria for dioxin bioremediation.Bioresources and bioprocessing · 2023Review
- Article
- Molecular Modelling of Polychlorinated Dibenzo-p-Dioxins Non-Covalent Interactions with β and γ-Cyclodextrins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Natural-based coagulants/flocculants as sustainable market-valued products for industrial wastewater treatment: a review of recent developments.RSC advances · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
This article provides a comprehensive assessment of dioxins contaminating the soil and evaluates the bioremediation technology currently being widely used, and also offers recommendations for future prospects. Soil pollution containing dioxins is extremely toxic and hazardous to human health and the environment. Dioxin concentrations in soils around the world are caused by a variety of sources and outcomes, but the main sources are from the consequences of war and human activities. Bioremediation technology (bioaugmentation, biostimulation, and phytoremediation) is considered an optimal and environmentally friendly technology, with the goal of applying native microbial communities and using plant species with a high biomass to treat contaminated dioxins in soil. The powerful bioremediation system is the growth of microorganisms that contribute to the increased mutualistic and competitive relationships between different strains of microorganisms. Although biological treatment technology can thoroughly treat contaminated dioxins in soil with high efficiency, the amount of gas generated and Cl radicals dispersed after the treatment process remains high. Further research on the subject is required to provide stricter control over the outputs noted in this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.