Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35736817›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Classification of BRCA2 Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS) Using an ACMG/AMP Model Incorporating a Homology-Directed Repair (HDR) Functional Assay.

Chunling Hu, Lisa R Susswein, Maegan E Roberts, Hana Yang, Megan L Marshall, Susan Hiraki, Windy Berkofsky-Fessler, Sounak Gupta, Wei Shen, Carolyn A Dunn and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reclassification ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Reclassification ofBiomolecules & biomedicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Chunling HuMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6814-4639
Lisa R SussweinGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Maegan E RobertsGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Hana YangMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Megan L MarshallGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Susan HirakiGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9799-2402
Windy Berkofsky-FesslerGeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Sounak GuptaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-5163-6955
Wei ShenMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3779-0451
Carolyn A DunnMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Huaizhi HuangMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jie NaMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3435-1805
Susan M DomchekUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-5914-7272
Siddhartha YadavMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-4630-9903
Alvaro N A MonteiroORCID 0000-0002-8448-4801
Eric C PolleyUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Steven N HartMayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7714-2734
Kathleen S Hruska *GeneDx, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Fergus J Couch *Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-9417-9985
Mayo Clinic · USOpGen (United States) · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Women's Cancer ProgramP30CA015083 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI AKHILESH PANDEY · 1985 to 2026
$151.3M
The Role of CHFR in Tumorigenesis and Paclitaxel-Sensitivity in Breast CancerP50CA116201 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2005 to 2026
$49.9M
Resolving the cancer relevance of predisposition gene mutationsR35CA253187 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Fergus Joseph Couch · 2020 to 2026
$5.8M
The contribution of RAD51C and RAD51D to breast and ovarian cancerR01CA225662 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI COUCH, FERGUS JOSEPH, WEROHA, SARAVUT · 2018 to 2024
$2.5M
Minority Predoctoral Fellowship ProgramF31CA106201 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI CRUZ-MONSERRATE, ZOBEIDA · 2003 to 2006
$109k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA106201NCI NIH HHS P30 CA015083NCI NIH HHS P50 CA116201NCI NIH HHS R01 CA225662NCI NIH HHS R35 CA253187
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe identification of variants of uncertain significance (VUS) in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes by hereditary cancer testing poses great challenges for the clinical management of variant carriers. The ACMG/AMP (American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics/Association for Molecular Pathology) variant classification framework, which incorporates multiple sources of evidence, has the potential to establish the clinical relevance of many VUS. We sought to classify the clinical relevance of 133 single-nucleotide substitution variants encoding missense variants in the DNA-binding domain (DBD) of BRCA2 by incorporating results from a validated functional assay into an ACMG/AMP-variant classification model from a hereditary cancer-testing laboratory. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe 133 selected VUS were evaluated using a validated homology-directed double-strand DNA break repair (HDR) functional assay. Results were combined with clinical and genetic data from variant carriers in a rules-based variant classification model for BRCA2.

resultsOf 133 missense variants, 44 were designated as non-functional and 89 were designated as functional in the HDR assay. When combined with genetic and clinical information from a single diagnostic laboratory in an ACMG/AMP-variant classification framework, 66 variants previously classified by the diagnostic laboratory were correctly classified, and 62 of 67 VUS (92.5%) were reclassified as likely pathogenic (n = 22) or likely benign (n = 40). In total, 44 variants were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic, 84 as benign/likely benign, and 5 remained as VUS.

conclusionsIncorporation of HDR functional analysis into an ACMG/AMP framework model substantially improves BRCA2 VUS re-classification and provides an important tool for determining the clinical relevance of individual BRCA2 VUS.

Indexed as

Genes, BRCA2NeoplasmsBRCA2 ProteinGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationHumansBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35736817
PMCPMC9433957
OpenAlexW4283363364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.