Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35736799›Full record

ArticleProteomes2022

A Comparison of Blood Plasma Small Extracellular Vesicle Enrichment Strategies for Proteomic Analysis.

Natalie P Turner, Pevindu Abeysinghe, Keith A Kwan Cheung, Kanchan Vaswani, Jayden Logan, Pawel Sadowski, Murray D Mitchell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proteomes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plasma-Derived Extracellular Vesicle Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Extracellular Vesicle Preparation and Analysis: A State-of-the-Art Review.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Natalie P TurnerCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2641-2295
Pevindu AbeysingheCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9354-352X
Keith A Kwan CheungCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Kanchan VaswaniCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Jayden LoganCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.
Pawel SadowskiCentral Analytical Research Facility (CARF), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1812-3490
Murray D MitchellCentre for Children's Health Research (CCHR), Queensland University of Technology (QUT), 62 Graham St., South Brisbane, QLD 4101, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6167-7176

Funding

Australian Research Council LP160101854DairyNZ DRCX1302New Zealand Ministry of Business DRCX1302
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteomic analysis of small extracellular vesicles (sEVs) poses a significant challenge. A 'gold-standard' method for plasma sEV enrichment for downstream proteomic analysis is yet to be established. Methods were evaluated for their capacity to successfully isolate and enrich sEVs from plasma, minimise the presence of highly abundant plasma proteins, and result in the optimum representation of sEV proteins by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Plasma from four cattle (Bos taurus) of similar physical attributes and genetics were used. Three methods of sEV enrichment were utilised: ultracentrifugation (UC), size-exclusion chromatography (SEC), and ultrafiltration (UF). These methods were combined to create four groups for methodological evaluation: UC + SEC, UC + SEC + UF, SEC + UC and SEC + UF. The UC + SEC method yielded the highest number of protein identifications (IDs). The SEC + UC method reduced plasma protein IDs compared to the other methods, but also resulted in the lowest number of protein IDs overall. The UC + SEC + UF method decreased sEV protein ID, particle number, mean and mode particle size, particle yield, and did not improve purity compared to the UC + SEC method. In this study, the UC + SEC method was the best method for sEV protein ID, purity, and overall particle yield. Our data suggest that the method and sequence of sEV enrichment strategy impacts protein ID, which may influence the outcome of biomarker discovery studies.

Indexed as

enrichmentexosomeextracellular vesicleextracellular vesiclesisolationmass spectrometryproteomicssize-exclusion chromatographysmall extracellular vesicleultracentrifugationultrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID35736799
PMCPMC9229025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.