Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35736700›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Feasibility of Old Bark and Wood Waste Recycling.

Yuliya Kulikova, Stanislav Sukhikh, Olga Babich, Margina Yuliya, Marina Krasnovskikh, Svetlana Noskova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuliya KulikovaInstitute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant BFU, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0896-4571
Stanislav SukhikhInstitute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant BFU, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Olga BabichInstitute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant BFU, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-4921-8997
Margina YuliyaEnvironmental Protection Department, Perm National Research Polytechnic University, 614000 Perm, Russia.
Marina KrasnovskikhDepartment of Inorganic Chemistry, Chemical Technology and Technosphere Safety, Perm State National Research University, St. Bukireva, 15, 614990 Perm, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5187-5590
Svetlana NoskovaInstitute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant BFU, 236016 Kaliningrad, Russia.
Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University · RUPerm National Research Polytechnic University · RUPerm State University · RU

Funding

Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation FZWM-2021-0016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pulp and paper industry leads to the formation of significant amounts of bark and wood waste (BWW), which is mostly dumped, causing negative climate and environmental impacts. This article presents an overview of methods for recycling BWW, as well as the results of assessing the resource potential of old bark waste based on physicochemical and thermal analysis. It was found that using BWW as a plant-growing substrate is challenging because it was observed that bark waste is phytotoxic. The C:N waste ratio is far from optimum; moreover, it has a low biodegradation rate (less than 0.15% per year). The calorific value content of BWW ranged from 7.7 to 18.9 MJ/kg on d.m., the ash content was from 4% to 22%, and the initial moisture content was from 60.8% to 74.9%, which allowed us to draw conclusions about the feasibility of using hydrothermal methods for their processing to obtain biofuel and for the unreasonableness of using traditional thermal methods (combustion, pyrolysis, gasification).

Indexed as

bark wastebiofuelbiomasscompostinghydrothermal methodsligninsustainable resourceswood forest product

Identifiers

PMID35736700
PMCPMC9230676
OpenAlexW4282590397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.