Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35736430›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2022

Impact of Skin Tissue Collection Method on Downstream MALDI-Imaging.

Manoj Yadav, Prem Prashant Chaudhary, Brandon N D'Souza, Jacquelyn Spathies, Ian A Myles

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topical Steroid Withdrawal Is a Targetable Excess of Mitochondrial NAD.The Journal of investigative dermatology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. TRPA1 InfluencesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The circadian metabolome of atopic dermatitis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Proteomics and Metabolomics in Biomedicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Manoj YadavEpithelial Therapeutics Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3483-8376
Prem Prashant ChaudharyEpithelial Therapeutics Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3467-8608
Brandon N D'SouzaEpithelial Therapeutics Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Jacquelyn SpathiesEpithelial Therapeutics Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
Ian A MylesEpithelial Therapeutics Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Intramural Research Program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MALDI imaging is a novel technique with which to study the pathophysiologies of diseases. Advancements in the field of metabolomics and lipidomics have been instrumental in mapping the signaling pathways involved in various diseases, such as cancer and neurodegenerative diseases (Parkinson's). MALDI imaging is flexible and can handle many sample types. Researchers primarily use either formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) or fresh frozen tissue samples to answer their scientific questions. FFPE samples allow for easy long-term storage, but the requirement for extensive sample processing may limit the ability to provide a clear picture of metabolite distribution in biological tissue. Frozen samples require less handling, but present logistical challenges for collection and storage. A few studies, mostly focused on cancer cell lines, have directly compared the results of MALDI imaging using these two tissue fixation approaches. Herein, we directly compared FFPE and fresh frozen sample preparation for murine skin samples, and performed detailed pathway analysis to understand how differences in processing impact MALDI results from otherwise identical tissues. Our results indicate that FFPE and fresh frozen methods differ significantly in the putative identified metabolite content and distribution. The fixation methods shared only 2037 metabolites in positive mode and only 4079 metabolites in negative ion mode. However, both fixation approaches allowed for downstream fluorescent staining, which may save time and resources for samples that are clinically precious. This work represents a direct comparison of the impacts of the two main tissue processing methods on subsequent MALDI-MSI. While our results are similar to previous work in cancer tissue, they provide novel insights for those using MALDI-MSI in skin.

Indexed as

FFPEIHCMALDI-MSImetabolites

Identifiers

PMID35736430
PMCPMC9227925
OpenAlexW4281875965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.